I think that’s a slight pun.
The “-archy” part comes from the greek for “to rule/command”. Monarchy = rule by a king, oligarchy = rule by few, etc.
And the “an-” part means “not” or “without”. So anarchy technically means “not ruled” or “without rule” - but if things are still being ruled, it would still be an “archy”, not a “not archy”.
The colours made it easier to not accidentally attack your own side
The chance that they agreed on that and she wouldn’t mention it is slim, though
Yeah recently had this happen in the. Net world for some projects: They went from free to commercial or some other reason, and then people quickly forked the last version before that. All with that idea that they’re the defenders of what was good about it.
But let’s face it, if you had anywhere near the interest and commitment to that subject matter, you’d already be maintaining a competing project, or be helping at the original one.
I think people are enticed by the glory of having a repo with many stars, but have no realistic idea how much of their time this would eat up if they were serious about it.
Well, there ARE torpedoes that pretend to be a ship in order to trick ships and other torpedoes to go for them, instead of the submarine that fired it.
But yeah “specifically” designed to sink ships sounds weird when that’s what most of them, with only few exceptions, do.
we’re talking about regular people
I thought we’re talking about Hüseyin Dogru?
Partly… Look at the original Nazis. The nazi part is usually added to make the distinction with different periods - but for that period, the whole nation is referred to as nazi Germany.
The only way this answer could have been more hung up on the letter instead of the spirit of that comment, would be if you had said “with just your eyes you can watch a video explaining that the world is round”.
My whole comment was that I’m not sure what the point is, because that’s not how it works in reality. So if you actually want to know, you’ll have to ask the author of the comment above me.
But if the best of what you can do with it doesn’t make sense, then why do it? It’s not like it’s helping, just distracting from the parts that DO work.
And kind of the same thing again: The universe wasn’t born with forms, either.
When we did a project for a redesign of our web app at work, when I showed stuff to the UXer he said “I see this is designed by a programmer. Because a programmer says: But it works.”
And indeed, that is how all of the comments I read here feel; that things like a denounced search are just irrelevant toys, instead of a solid part of the toolkit of a professional modern developer.
To make it “pretty”? That’s more CSS I would say, and JS would be more about UX.
Which I haven’t seen anybody here mention. Which is kinda giving antisocial nerds with hobby projects? I mean, in professional development you learn very quickly how ux is correlated to helpdesk tickets.
Like, we can talk about technical purity excercises all day, but code doesn’t exist for its own sake.
You ask the librarian how often the word “arrow” is in Lord of the Rings, and they have to tell you?
Well… studying computer science in order to write production code, is like studying chemistry to become a chef.
I can assure you, unlike OP, I am comfortable using different collection types as the tools they are, even without having spent years studying the theory behind them.
Based on other protests, probably?
Apart from that, killing 12000 people is a huge effort even for a military using artillery and whatnot. If you have some military insight, just think of the logistics.
Or compare to the massacres Nazis did in WW2. Extreme cases like the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising had something like 20000 people killed on site, so you see how believing that they pulled of more than half of that here, without all the supporting context the nazis had, is not a given.
Technically yes, but in the context of symbols (which is what this is about) it doesn’t work.
If you stumbled upon a sign with a bug exoskeleton, you’d think “ah yes, this means death”?
Premise: You need to see it in order to speak up against it.
Question to you: Do you speak up against child porn?
Don’t orcas prey on them when they’re young?
As far as i understand, it’s easier to be on either end of the spectrum, so there are already colors that do that in nature.
Yeah the thing is that each part of “public static void” is a feature. Which other languages don’t have.
Still makes a good meme for programmers who are not experienced enough to know that.
Aside from purely theoretical, philosophical interest (suuuure), it doesn’t really matter, does it?
“Ah yes, now that you showed us the opinion of these online strangers on your phone, we will be ok angering your father - the man who famously hires ex-legionnaires for protection of his family - for a little hanky panky.”