“Beyond any doubt” would mean abolishing it. It is an impossible standard

Any case held to the standard of “beyond any doubt” would be trivially defended. It is theoretically possible we’re all in the matrix and the whole case was just faked by our all-powerful machine overlords. Is the doubt reasonable? No. Is it a doubt? Yes

I’m in favor of abolishing the death penalty. We shouldn’t do it with roundabout semantics and sham trials though

Sam was fired because the board stated he withheld information and misinformed them, not because he was a bad CEO