Doing a drone strike to kill specific people not officially part of a government is vastly different than destroying infrastructure that is still controlled by a country’s government.

If in the moment you’re replying to your own interpretation, you’re fine. But the second you overthink about their intentions, you will be freaking out, and that’s what the machine sees. One technique for bypassing lie detectors is to raise the baseline by flexing your butthole but there’s techniques to catch that, too.

I was expecting it, too. I thought the AI picture of Trump as pope meant he had pulled strings to get an American, and was planning on combining that with his Deus Vult - tattooed secretary of defense to start a literal Crusade.

They call it hallucinations like it’s a cute brain fart, and “Agentic” means they’re using the output of one to be the input of another, which has access to things and can make decisions and actually fuck things up. It’s a complete fucking shit show. But humans are expensive so replacing them makes line go up.

Hey look, another person got blackmailed into fascism. Surely a coincidence

Popping the telecom infra doesn’t automatically grant access to Signal messages.

So even then, the union people might be making more than the union minimum, so the non union person might still be making less than an average union person while not getting any union benefits.

My guess is he’s trying to rename Testosterone Deficiency Syndrome because he has it.

You’re acting like you found some defensible loophole but your cageyness means you know it won’t work if the facts were laid out before jury selection.

The question isn’t about “the” law it means “any” law. The judge is asking you if you’re going to enforce the law for which they are under trial, not if you’re here to enforce the constitution. If that is what you wanted to do you would vote guilty and let them appeal to the Supreme Court because they are the constitution people, not you.

Say No, but provide that elaboration, and see what happens. You’re still lying, dude.

How do you expect to win… anything… if you don’t fight for it?

It’s even worse when you consider the entire point of advertising is to deliver a targeted payload at a very specific demographic. So you can target IT folks of a specific company, etc.

What exactly is it that makes his face look so small. Seriously.

The existence of communities such as “leopards eating faces” disproves that. Yes, it might be really late, but people are realizing that they thought they were voting for something else.

Read the article.

Good fucking luck on the ten year thing.

If there is a magical amount of money you want to receive so you don’t get pissed off at me, just make that the price.

Your opinion is a result of class warfare propaganda, to get working class people arguing with each other. Direct your anger to the employer.

That password reset looked to be like step four of something. So it’s a business logic bypass. Still awful of course but slightly more understandable given other ways this vulnerability could have been introduced. The cool part was detecting all the steps completely blackbox because everything was in the Javascript.

There is no excuse for issuing a valid token before mfa succeeds though. That is negligent.

He said that some users might leave as a form of virtue signaling, not that all who leave will be virtue signaling.

Have there been cases of community notes being ineffective or wrong? I assume that community notes probably have some kind of system that can be abused, but I haven’t seen it happen.