Thats the beauty of being in a high demand line of work? I struggle to see how being a swe could leave you with no voice. You have mobility and are highly paid. If your company isn’t doing well go find a new job?
I totally understand why people want unions for lower demand work. But I don’t understand it for sw.
That’s an … Interesting methodology and take.
What benefit would a union get me? A lot of the benefits I’ve seen from unions I already have. I don’t want seniority based pay. Its already really hard to get rid of coworkers that underperform to the point of impacting others job performance.
Same. I wrote a ton of pages about his work as governor and lost points bc it didn’t cover his achievements as president. I asked the teacher if she could name one, and she told me that was my job. She was forced to retire after that year.
These have a high probability of working but it isn’t perfect. And not all of them tell you which way the bit was flipped.
Yup. There is technology to deal with this. But does every piece of hw have that tech? No. Does every piece of sw run eccs for this purpose? No.
Yeah if vs iff can be confusing at first. Trying to understand it with normal grammar doesn’t work right. It’s a lot more helpful to grok the symbols and so the truth tables by hand to see how they fit together
Since someone is going to be elected pretty much no matter what, “practice shooting if a tone is elected” is logically equivalent to “practice shooting”.
Banning proponents of 2A is a bit weird for a politics sub but I like it. Gun nuts are crazy.
Fortunately the rules allow for celebrating violence and advocating for nonviolent deaths. If you’re going to be pedantic about the exact meaning of your rules to stifle opposition, write better rules.
I mean it is the definition of “if and only if”. And by commutativity we also know that A iff B is equal to B iff A
No. They are effectively the same statement.
(A <=> B ) = (A=>B AND B=> A)
India and China have similar populations. It’s a bit disingenuous to say China has as much pop as the next 6 countries.
I think you have that analogy backwards. The point was that the industrial proletariat stayed underground while the bourgeois regressed into the eloi bc they had built the overworked utopia and had no need to do anything. This is the literal way the rich.
People who buy chastity cages presumably want someone to lick them in it and refuse to let them out … like the hacker was doing to them.
"I don’t like to cook in a messy kitchen. You might not understand why this bothers me. And it might not bother you, but it bothers me a lot. So when I ask you to put the dishes away, and they aren’t put away by the time I next want to cook, it makes me feel disrespected and ignored.
How can we work together to fix this?"
I want this thing bc I like it is a totally valid feeling. Don’t get bogged down in an argument about how it doesn’t matter if the kitchen is messy. It matters to you and that is important in and of itself. Bc you’re never going to get him to understand why you care about this. He doesn’t and will try to convince you that you also shouldnt worry about this. You need to reframe as “I want this thing, help me get it”
I say this bc I’m the partner that goes “we don’t need to do X bc …”. I try to avoid this type of problem by proactively asking my partner is this something you’re trying to solve or something you want don’t bc that’s how you like it.
That’s not exactly what I’m saying. I’m not saying your goals for him are unrealistic. But are they his goals?
In his head he’s probably going “it’s only 4 items why does it block cooking I can just do it later”.
And my guess is that you are trying to communicate the problem and either he’s not listening or he’s not hearing. The former there’s not much you can do about. But the latter means you might need to explain things a different way.
Sounds like your values wrt to chores don’t align. If you’ve “tried going on strike” and the result is that he doesn’t care, then maybe this is something that only you care about. And that would completely explain the situation – his goal is to make you happy, so he takes what actions will stop you from complaining, you think he’s learned, and then he goes back to it bc he sees that there’s no more complaints.
I don’t think anyone has accused you of being an asshole. But it’s possible your standards for living are higher than his. That isn’t necessarily insurmountable, but y’all probably should have that discussion.
There’s always accusations of weaponized incompetence on these types of posts. And while that’s definitely a real thing that happens, I figure a lot more often it’s laziness/not being interested in the result. I figure this is often a result of not ever living alone. If I don’t wash my clothes, I don’t have clothes to wear. I could be less lazy about using the laundry, or I could own more clothes and do laundry in greater bulk. Some people chose the former. Some chose the latter. I find both acceptable. If I had a partner that would do the chore for me, I’d thank them, but I’d also tell them that I’d get to it eventually and that everything would be fine.
Did you specify a time when the dishes had to be washed and put away? It’s obvious to you that it needs to be done before the next meal is prepared, but is it obvious to your partner? Do they typically help you with washing, cooking or putting away if dishes? Did they learn how cooking works as a child? I find it pretty likely that your partner would find it obvious if they thought about it, but most tasks don’t require deep thought.
Now naturally you shouldn’t really have to put a time limit on chores, but it is a lot harder to separate ignorance from malice if you don’t have clear (and potentially documented) expectations.
Poke about in registry, Google problems where the solutions are for the wrong version of windows, wade through driver problems, find that the issue is in a toggle that used to be easy to find in control panel but now is buried under layers of crap
That’s all true for game dev but not the rest of tech. If you know that something is wrong you flee before it actually goes bad. Also you can interview for new jobs before you leave the previous one so you don’t have an insurance issue.
Tech workers aren’t above working class concerns. But I’m sick of having to fight the rest of the working class to make any change. I’ll help, but I’m not going to put in a ton of effort for something to help others when those others are hell bent on not receiving that help.