The immigrant didn’t cost anyone their job, try to put the corpo boot down for a second and think. The capitalist cost you your job, because they can exploit someone else better than you at both of your expenses. You lose a high paying job, and immigrant gets less rights and a lower wage than someone with your privilege would have. The capitalist could afford to hire both of you with decent wages and benefits, and as a worker you know there is plenty of work you could use more people to help with.
The immigrant did not attack you and steal anything from you, they were looking for an opportunity to provide for themselves and their family just like you when you were looking for that job. They weren’t in the board room when the execs decided you were too much of a problem legally and financially.
Edit: User started editing their posts and is just parroting the same phrase over and over and not answering questions to further the debate. Either they’re hopelessly clueless and knee-deep in the corpo propaganda or they’re just really bad a trolling. Not worth debating further, imo.









You are saying that, though. By saying both of them are at fault, you are implicitly stating that the immigrant did something wrong in this scenario. By your logic, you also did something wrong by applying for the job. It is highly likely the person before you was also being paid more and you got the job for less, making you exactly the same as the immigrant in this scenario.
How exactly, and be direct, did the immigrant wrong you here by seeking employment? Again, they do not know the background that you specifically were cut. The capitalist does, however.