How is that a tough choice?

First, Biden isn’t talking about banning all guns, he wants to regulate assault rifles and institute mandated background checks to stop children from being shot in their own neighborhoods every day.

Then, his administration includes the first black vice president, 25 appointed black judges, wrote that executive order about protecting minority voting rights since they’re targeted so often.

On the other side, dumps will say anything to get you to vote for him, and goes back on his promises anytime it’s personally inconvenient, so you can’t trust anything he says on guns or racial Justice.

Trump has apparently has given zero thought to racial Justice, which shouldn’t be surprising to anyone.

I’m definitely going to ignore insignificance.

“They may not be “significant”, but you have political commentators thinking it would be for the best”.

Yup. Insignificant performing pundits.

Still insignificant.

Trump stumbles over his words or says nonsense, was an absolute s***show of a president who constantly lied.

Biden stumbles over his words or says nonsense, has been a great president and has done what he said he was going to do.

The Democrats do not need anybody better, Biden is achieving all of his policy aims that are in line with progressives in the United States

If you want to see somebody tap dancing, go to Broadway.

As far as the administration of the country goes, Biden is doing a very good job developing and supporting civil rights, the environment, sustainable technology and the economy.

Many people who didn’t watch the debate, don’t regularly watch his public appearances and read internet comments feel the same way you do.

Calls for biden to step down are not significant in the real world, they are baseless epithets repeated on the internet by anonymous strangers or established conservatives.

The concerns of people are being addressed, any claims to the contrary are not based in fact.

“what’s he going to be like in his mid-80s”

Not as important to holding the office of the President as people are misapprehending. Biden’s not a car salesman, he is administering a country, and he’s good at it. He can wear polka dot bow ties for all I care. FDR was in a wheelchair and often couldn’t speak at all.

Anyone who believes there’s any reason to replace Biden as the presidential candidate at this point is either allowing themself to be fooled by internet trolls or is a troll themselves.

Are you going off the two five-second clips that are being repeated everywhere or the entire debate?

For an event that means so little substantively, “pretty well” is a good metric.

If you walk through a manure mister and look pretty well at the end of it, you’re good.

Also, he has regular public performances before and after that event, if you watch any of those, he’s fine.

4 years of effective administration is more significant testament to biden’s ability to lead than standing on stage next to an idiot for 90 minutes.

Cool, thanks.

That’s the way, I usually vote independent.

This time, though, Biden is doing everything I was looking for from the green party so yeah, I’m good this round.

Do you have a single issue that you’re voting on , or is it just independent on principle regardless of the issues?

Absolutely absurd.

He’s been doing a great job for 4 years, standing next to dumps, who can’t string two sentences together, and being asked palatable questions that basically mean nothing, I think he did pretty well for an 81-year-old.

Also, biden’s a great president, they don’t need anyone better.

People were pissed at me calling this yesterday.

I was wondering why they all abruptly stopped messaging me a couple hours ago.

The decided voters are where they are.

If you’re undecided, and you watch this debate with an open mind, there’s only one logical conclusion if you want your life to get better, and that’s to vote for Biden.

It was 4 years of trump damaging the US, telling lies and objectively being shown not to follow through on what he says, then being found liable for rape and treason.

Even though Biden mumbled some words, his answered questions were believable because they were in line with the last 4 years of his administration, that have been great for civil rights,the environment, sustainable technology, infrastructure and the economy.

No-brainer for the undecided.

One can only hope his is a cautionary tale for privileged others who think they’re above the law.

So funny.

Have fun in jail, asshole

Haha, that’s a great way to think about it. Gender jesters

Ah, “exaggerated” is keying me in to a more complete definition, thanks

Digital IDs that Protect Privacy.

Protection From Digital ID Corruption.

Anything concise that conveys a couple core points

A great point in dire need of a better title.

That’s a good point.

There has to be something over the top about the performance, right?

Because I think of David bowie and obviously he had different personalities and quite flashy costumes, but it would be difficult for me to say he was doing drag, partly because he was so poised.

It’s definitely an interesting piece of culture.

Thanks.

Yeah I definitely identified those bands as drag, I just didn’t know it could be anyone.

So look plus performance equals drag?

Thanks

Hi, I know nothing about the drag scene, curious about the definition here.

I thought drag was specifically men dressing up as women, is drag any gender putting on too much makeup and wearing gaudy outfits?

It’s just the look?

I had to read it like six times before I concluded that there was something wrong with the article and not my reading comprehension.

Maybe a third party will come along and help both of us out.

The article seems to contradict itself.

You are right, it says that the part on the jurors was lifted, but then a few paragraphs later it says:

“While he lifted that piece of the gag order, the judge ruled that a prohibition on disclosing juror information will remain in effect until further notice.”

So if that’s correct then it’s only the witness that the ban has been lifted on.

But why is the article saying two different things about the jurors?

And why the heck would any part of the gag order be lifted at all?

Weird