• 0 Posts
  • 719 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023
  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgtoTechnology@beehaw.org•What’s Richard Stallman’s dream social network? XMPP!
    19·
    1 year ago

    I think the problem there is that, for many years, nobody bothered to explain to him exactly why child porn is bad.

    Most people observe that everyone else thinks it’s bad and don’t question it any further. That’s not good enough for Stallman, though, and for good reason: expecting him to unquestioningly bow to peer pressure is an insult to his intelligence.

    Someone did eventually explain the problem to Stallman. I don’t know what exactly was explained, but my guess is that Stallman was told that child porn is non-consensual and therefore violates the child’s privacy, similar to how revenge porn violates the subject’s privacy. At any rate, after that discussion took place, Stallman did an about-face on the subject, and is now opposed to child porn like anyone else.

    Moral of the story: taboos and peer pressure bad; logic and education good.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•If you were to run for higher office in your country, what controversial thing would the vetting process uncover about you?
    11·
    1 year ago

    First, despite there being multiple school shootings this year, school shootings are a tiny fraction of the overall homicides in the US

    Which are also often committed with guns…

    which are, in turn, dwarfed by the number of suicides committed with firearms.

    I’m not talking about suicide.

    Second, looking at your link you provided, you see a lot of things like, “A gun was fired during a fight near a basketball game at Appoquinimink High School. No injuries were reported”, and “Bullets struck two windows of classrooms at PS 78 in the Stapleton neighborhood of Staten Island. One classroom was occupied by ten adults, but no bullets entered the classrooms” being counted as "school shootings:, which you then compare to Columbine. You are intentionally, and in bad faith, conflating entirely different things, and placing them all under the heading of, “firearms near schools”.

    I did nothing of the sort. There are multiple bona fide school shootings in that list, such as the Michigan State shooting and the Covenant shooting.

    It is relevant, because it has different causes, and is thus addressed differently.

    That’s not a meaningful answer. Let’s have some details.

    Are you willing to engage in good faith, or have you already decided that the only solution is banning firearms?

    Are you willing to engage in good faith? So far, you’ve argued based on false premises (namely that school shootings are rare, and that there are no bona fide school shootings in the previously linked Wikipedia list) and evasive non-answers (namely that targeted violence at school is to be “addressed differently”, with no explanation of how). Doesn’t seem like good faith to me.