I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.

Actually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.

The biggest problem with Frontiers for me is that there are some handy survey articles that are cited like 500 times. It seems that Interdisciplinary surveys are hard to publish in a traditional journal, and as a result 500 articles cited this handy overview article for readers who would need an overview.

The article I checked was in a reasonable quality, and it’s a shame I can’t cite it just because it’s in Frontiers.

It’s how this publisher works. They make it insanely difficult for reviewers to reject a submission.

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

No idea why this is controversial. As a compsci researcher I have always been exploited for their spreadsheets that only satisfy government officials and not the society.

Singin’ we will we will rock you!

AIs are inaccurate. Conservatives are stupid.

I respect Jeff Bezos because he works so hard he could only send dick pics during company meetings.

Tbf it was always a nightmare to manage driver conflicts on Windows 95.

Checks kbin and kbin app status. Sad, but the burnout part is true at least.

There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…

the timing is extremely odd

Right?

Not by Putin, but the most brutal I know in the history was for the previous Japanese Emperor in 1948. They executed A-class war criminals (his father’s cronies) on his birthday. The most shocking part imo is that he was only becoming 15.

Killed acquaintances of a kid on his birthday omg…

Putin rotting his own institutions again…

I feel like Google results these days value the domain rather than the individual webpages instead. Always the same websites…

I can imagine. Vast majority of applications I receive as a manager has nothing to do with the job. Those are often just copypasta used for dozens of letters.

I am a highly skilled…

Just read the first 5 words and throw it away.

Reading this article, these tools look into characteristics like hobbies, while apparently ignoring logic in a written text. Sure, the outcome’s gonna be horrible.

Also, you’re gonna miss unique talents because all it does is to learn typical good candidates. No way you’ll find Jobs!

It’s a result of systematic job training and matching. 10s of thousands of people with similar backgrounds (college / university degrees, formalized through central controls, for example), applying through a few websites.

There’s of course gonna be mass application.