bigbangdangler

Linguistically: yes, and it’s typically attributed to a working memory constraint.

– the dems

Arch people tend to want people to know they use Arch (btw). You’ll also find a lot of posts about getting Arch working.

Debian people tend to be too busy doing other things on their computers besides getting them working, so you’ll hear about it less.

(Important: I’m not dumping on either distro here. Some people, myself included, like Arch exactly because it’s fun to play with and set up. Debian’s older packages tend to mean a more stable system. Use what you like.)

And we’re still in the “let’s be cheap and try and undercut each other” phase, before the snake eats its own tail. Things only get more expensive from here.

Meanwhile whole careers are in shambles because of these greedy asshats.

What a fucking joke.

Everyone is saying it

So efficient!

Not sure it’s a majority, but agree there is a huge contingent of people who seem to think this direction is good. Or maybe it just feels huge because, you know, bots

All that asskissing must lead to sore lips

Don’t threaten me with a good time. Deliver it.

I love this. Hit me in the right spot. Thanks.

Guillotines. Invest now before it’s too late!

Even the headline is wrong. Jobs have already started disappearing due to AI.

I have been using qwen-3.5-9b as a general purpose LLM that I can still load up while gaming (on a 16GB card). I never have issues if I’m under 10ish gigs of VRAM usage for the game, so I imagine it should work for your use case.

I’ve been generally happy with the results on everyday reasoning tasks and programming questions.

Jellyfin has definitely gotten leaps and bounds better in the last 4 years.

I pressed it. Just pressed it again. Turns out it doesn’t show up on Lemmy. Lol

The fact that there’s even a whiff of Kamala running again is great evidence that we are so fucked and will continue to be so fucked.

Yeah OK, I just had to read that twice to see you’re right.

The title is ambiguous (or perhaps vague, more accurately).

“doesn’t let me use my 32 char password” can be interpreted as:

• it does not allow passwords of 32 characters in length, regardless of composition

• it does allow passwords of 32 characters in length, which should be sufficient with or without special characters

In one reading, the special character requirement is the issue. In the other, the length.

Yay for English.

Incorrect. I get down with the sickness or with my bad self.

Cheers

Money.