Ok, “communists want to force their will upon everyone else which necessitates murder”

Are you happy?

That’s literally what they want. You depressed and suicidal. The task is reducing population by like 7.5 billion.

Torrenting often maxes out my download speed as well.

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people?

When the law declares that I have no freedom to choose what I do with my life, no freedom of movement and no private property, that isn’t a law I am going to ever accept. So it necessitates violence against me, obviously.

‘communists want to kill everyone’

More like, “communists want to force their will upon everyone else which necessitates violence”

‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’

Duh? Communism requires property appropriation. How exactly do you steal property without violence?

‘well having laws means killing people’

That’s you, not me.

Look, it’s really simple.

You can’t have communism unless everyone participates, and you can 100% guarantee not everyone will want to participate.

Therefore, either they are forced to participate, or it doesn’t happen. There really isn’t another option.

They just haven’t been prodded sufficiently to spill what they really want post-revolution and how exactly they would accomplish it. If kumbaya is their plan, well, it isn’t going to succeed.

🤦‍♂️

Literally just explained and demonstrated with an example of how communism inevitably requires violence, and that literally every communist would agree, but you just plug your ears and go lalala. Ok buddy.

“that ethnic group there, that sexual minority over there, and those miscegenators over there, must be exterminated for the purity of our nation”.

I think that’s just tribalism, not fascism. Merriam-webster defines fascism as:

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

You need to tick all the boxes to qualify.

Come back down to the real world. People don’t want communism unless you force them into it under the barrel of a gun. Communism means my individual wants, needs, and property is decided by the will of the people, which in reality translates to the will of a few dozen elite Party members at the top of the scheme. I’m not an ant in a colony.

As someone whose family has been massacred by Stalin’s repressions while every single possession was stolen, I’m going to go ahead and not join your cult. Thanks. I bet if it happened again, you’d be cheering in support.

How’s that? Every time I’ve pressed a communist about how they will deal with non conformity should their revolution succeed, they eventually agree that the plan is to kill them.

The snowflake people literally cannot handle neutrality. Their heads start exploding.

So, can we extend that to any communist group as well then?

Democracy is tyranny of the majority.

Ideally the community of instances would take action against beehaw and defederate them en masse, strengthening the wall they decided to erect. Until they write up an apology letter.

But hey, that ain’t gonna happen.

I’m not juiced up, I’m just watching the drama, and honestly, this is nothing unexpected. The type of people who like to suppress any deviation from the party line just can’t act otherwise.

I need more popcorn.

Well here’s an account equal to yours in age saying good riddance.

Nothing of value was lost.

Is that your position based on the actual content over there, or is that just a reaction to an instance (any instance) defederating?

I take that to mean “mingling with the minds of those who are ok with such an action is not worthwhile anyway”.

Then again, the original comment is deleted by creator, so what do I know. Looks like the entire account is gone, dude left.

I don’t think you should be expecting any curation if you’re looking at the All tab.

So far this instance alignes with my values. If this changes I will leave.

I’m not British, but when camping my friends use the original meaning of the word “faggot”.

Hey, the fire’s about to die, bring us another faggot.

Can we agree that the public fediverse should not be a curated safe space where ideas not supported by your political leaders are suppressed but instead just moderated for personal insults and harassment and such?

I’ve already watched at least two people get banned for sharing a story that doesn’t jive with the popular opinion on some instances.

I don’t want another echochamber.