No doubt. Just saying If you’re in the capitalist world, it’s coming to you too.

This has little to do with the country it’s based in and everything to do with the economic system it exists in.

What it did not do, explicitly, was grant Tesla the right to use public or private property for wastewater conveyance.

It’s still an illegal discharge. There are multiple things listed that are not good for the local environment. Even phosphorus and ammonia can be damaging by stimulating algae blooms.

You ran Napster on a 486? I was on a Pentium 200MMX in that era.

So you can still consume them with the volume off

Whey protein is awesome and there’s a large body of peer reviewed research supporting it. It’s just as good as eating a bunch of chicken or pork but faster and easier. It is just another tool in the box for hitting your macronutrient goals.

However, it won’t do anything without exercise and it’s not a substitute for eating a proper diet.

anabolic steroids are controlled substances

Because I’m 40 and want to get jacked and my diet and training are pretty well dialed in. I figure I got one last decade before I’m officially old, so why not juice a bit? Under medical supervision, of course.

deleted by creator

Yeah, I skimmed the article. It’s not really relevant. Everything uses technology in some aspect, yet everything isn’t relevant in this community.

Respectfully, how is this relevant to this specific community?

Fair enough.

The investigation proposes the 50cm by 50cm hole in the Ursa Major’s hull would likely have been made by a Barracuda supercavitating torpedo.

Doesn’t seem like it’d be the South Korean one, though. Just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

What makes you think supercavitating torpedoes are involved at all?

What would a South Korean torpedo two-thirds of the way through development today have anything to do with a Russian ship sinking off the coast of Spain a year and a half ago?

I’d wager this was Ukraine’s handiwork using conventional or drone weapons.

Should have read more, I wasn’t aware that was part of the question. I’m just posting about niche usage apps I like. I don’t use them often, but they’re essential for their niche.

Idk if this counts, but I use the Reminders app on my phone to create packing lists for work travel. Very easy to uncheck everything then re-check off things as you pack them. Keep building a perpetual packing list and you’ll never forget things. Lists in general are awesome for offloading cognitive workload.

Merlin Bird ID - it’s Shazam for bird calls with a Pokédex for tracking what you’ve discovered.

See my comment above with the battery university link, small depth of charge/discharge and frequent cycling is optimal for lithium ion batteries. The longest longevity was many 75-65% cycles, followed by 75-25%, then 85-25%, and lastly 100-25%. There’s nothing wrong with small cycles on lithium ion batteries.

I don’t believe you’re correct. Small discharge cycles are not at all bad for the battery.

https://www.batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-808-how-to-prolong-lithium-based-batteries/

Similar to a mechanical device that wears out faster with heavy use, the depth of discharge (DoD) determines the cycle count of the battery. The smaller the discharge (low DoD), the longer the battery will last. If at all possible, avoid full discharges and charge the battery more often between uses. Partial discharge on Li-ion is fine. There is no memory and the battery does not need periodic full discharge cycles to prolong life. The exception may be a periodic calibration of the fuel gauge on a smart battery or intelligent device.

If you look at figure 6, cycling from 75-65% was better than 75-25%.

You’re thinking of keeping the battery constantly charged at an elevated voltage, eg 90-100%. There’s nothing wrong with many small cycles. The most optimal way to use a lithium ion would be many charge cycles and the battery constantly going from 49-51%.

deleted by creator