Voyager. It shows actual usernames and not display names. You’re seeing my display name, not my username.

You know… I totally forgot that I set that as my display name. No offense taken, obviously. I use a third-party Lemmy client so it never shows me that. 🤷‍♂️

Huh?

Used or owned? I own one and bought several for my company and they’re not useless at all. They’re just limited in the AR/VR experiences you can do right now. As a computer, productivity, and production device, it’s far from useless.

I’m pretty privileged to be in a good spot and even I can see the writing on the wall - everyone around me is sad, overwhelmed, stressed, and angry and they can’t find anything that opens the release valve. I don’t understand how all these selfish bastards can look around and think that the US is doing great.

That’s why the captivity is so desirable and why it’s only going to get worse. Desperate people don’t have the luxury of caring if the job they take is going to be fulfilling or happy. They need the money more than any empathy or principles they have. If people are sad, you replace them because there’s crowds of desperate people that also quit their last job because it made them unhappy and now all their bills are 10-15% higher than they were before.

The dude’s rocker is off its rocker…

I don’t think they could, at least not in the timeframe provided by the EU. That’s the entire (and only) reason they’re reverting to the existing implementation. The existing law, as written, doesn’t seem to apply to PWAs.

Yes, it is. The only change being made is that WebKit home apps are being allowed. Since Apple couldn’t create the Home app frameworks for third party apps, they disabled all of them to comply with the new rules. This just means that, unless the EU says otherwise, Home Screen WebKit apps are still ok without needing to open to third-party engines. This is a non-story as that is already the currently released functionality and the change was only made because Apple was attempting to be conservative with its compliance.

It’s not VR if you can see the real world. That’s literally the only distinction between the two and you messed it up.

lol. This is ridiculous.

The parent clearly was making it seem like there was some kind of official presentation where he got this trophy. C’mon…Don’t pretend like there was any substance to that. It’s not like he accepted it.

It was literally over and done with in less than a minute and the video alone is only 25 seconds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x40jxIqlfOs

He wasn’t presented with anything. A prankster group just walked up to him with a fake award. They were escorted away immediately. You don’t like getting into those pesky details do you?

Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x40jxIqlfOs

Wtf are you talking about dude? I think you completely misread those.

If your PS5 is standing upright, you can’t load the disc sideways like you normally would because the drive won’t be oriented the same way. Duh.

Your initial post was “wtf is the use case for this”. The answer to that is literally anything computational that has physical limitations.

This structure was literally offered by the judge in the Epic case. The judge said that Apple is entitled to the fees whether the transactions are completed by Apple or not as long as they originated on the platform that Apple maintains and grows.

How have they been “pushing these headsets for years” considering that we’re literally discussing the launch of this product?

This doesn’t make any sense at all. You know Tron was fiction, right? VR existed back then in the same way that neural prosthetics do now. There are like 5 working versions and none of them are functional enough to be used by the public. “The headset sucks and gives you a headache” is a nonsense generalization. There are hundreds of headsets out there and many people can use any number of them without any headache whatsoever.

The parent is right. This is the same pattern that repeats every time. People say it’ll never take off and then it absolutely does.

If you can’t see any use case for this, especially as they become smaller and cheaper, then no one is going to convince you otherwise. Even now, there are literally thousands of scenarios where a headset with no physical limitations is going to be more preferable than needing an entire room in your house or office for your computer setup.

I don’t understand this. Using something like this would give people more immediate access to all the information in the room and increase the amount of information they have access to. Your vision isn’t obscured with this. That’s why they’re calling it a “spatial computer”.