SpaceOS is built for the modern Web, so anything you do on the Web, you can now do - in space.
AKA it’s a glorified Chromebook in terms of functionality. Not there yet…
SpaceOS is built for the modern Web, so anything you do on the Web, you can now do - in space.
AKA it’s a glorified Chromebook in terms of functionality. Not there yet…
Don’t see it. Could somebody give me a pointer?
I mean, I don’t think that’s the way to go about it. Trains don’t take me to my family across the planet in 11 hours. I’d prefer to feel secure when flying there.
I’m both, I say fuck all the time. I fuck on and off the clock.
My first thought exactly :P
It’s still very impressive. The EEG she uses only reads general thoughts: e.g. thinking about pushing a boulder. She can only really do specific actions with that: there’s no level of analog control (how much should this move), it’s just a single action (fire a fireball). The brain chip is likely much higher fidelity and therefore can read much finer signals. All the credit goes to the researchers, of course, who’ve spent the last decade researching and fine tuning this technology.
IIRC they’re paralyzed from the shoulders down, so probably not.
damn bleeding edge males
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8/9 Ultra. Publically made fun of Apple’s notch, then released their tablets with a notch a few months later. (Although tbf nowhere near as pronounced as Apple’s and mostly justified due to the extremely thin bezels).
This is mildly infuriating?
First guy looks really happy he forgot the BBQ tools.
I mean, it will be. The AI friend is always available, always knows what to say, never fights with you, and never messes up (ideally).
However, all those things are part of the human element: and at the end, you’re still talking to a computer. The AIs are just trying to please you. A person can actually love you, and that’s something else. And I’d take that over the perfect chatbot any day.
Journalists use AI to write longer articles. People use AI to summarize those articles.
The circle of LLMs.
If someone had made the active choice to use Firefox, I think they’d notice if it was replaced by Edge…
Over a year now, mine still hasn’t :)
They’re both pretty on par for the most part. If it’s too much of a hassle, there’s no real need to switch.
Now that Gitea is owned by a for-profit company, people are afraid that they’ll be making anti-user changes. This, Forgejo was born. It pulls from Gitea weekly, so it’s not missing anything. It’s also got some of its own features on top, but they’re currently pretty minor. Also, most of the features end up getting backported back to Gitea, so they’re mostly on par with each other. However, many features find themselves in Forgejo first, as they don’t have the copyright assignment for code that Gitea does. Additionally, security vulnerabilities tend to get fixed faster on Forgejo. They are working on federation plans, however, so we’ll see how that pans out.
Overall, there’s no downside of switching to Forgejo, and you’ll probably be protected if Gitea Ltd. makes some stupid decisions in the future. However, at the moment, there’s no immediate advantage to switching, so you can stick with Gitea if you’d like.
Make the phone half as thick, then double the battery and fill the rest with thermals.
Apple: Yes, yes, this innovation constitutes a $600 price increase.