And doesn’t this basically admit to the crime?

Why was this written like this? It makes no sense. I’ll git blame it and ask them what’s going on. Oh it’s me…

Isn’t new York flooded right now?

I just peeked at the docs and right off the bat I don’t like how they have conflicting attributes like hx-get and hx-post. What happens if both are set at the same time? Why not just have hx-method?

Because it’s the country the company is based in.

By the end of the meeting you have 10 more questions and no answers and more meetings to discuss the new questions

It’s basically a book you can talk to. A book can contain incredibly knowledge, but it’s a preserve artifact of intelligence, not intelligence.

Great way to lose all the best people at your company in a totally uncontrolled manner.

And he’s blaming the anti defamation league…

Shouldn’t that already be covered under revenge porn laws? At least the distribution side of it.

Calling them psychologists is giving them too much credit, but you’re right that the companies trying to trick them are putting tons of resources into it.

Most mushrooms won’t kill you

That’s not very reassuring

This has been happening for way longer than that

Even for indexes I do index or something more specific for what it’s indexing. Any simple iteration I just do map or each so the only time I ever need to actually index things is for more complex scenarios in which case it’s worth it to have better names. Also with modem IDEs, auto complete is really good so you don’t need to write a full variable name more than once.

That’s a lot of work for something that could be corrected for in a few seconds with find and replace

So ignore all the things he says should be done beyond deplatforming and just get angry about made up assumptions that you extrapolated off your interpretation of tone? Get outta here

Most of his suggestions are just advocating for greater transparency. What’s the weird part?

This ruling seems to be really badly misinterpreted. The case wasn’t for people using ai tools to create works but from a computer scientist who created a completely autonomous tool and was trying to co-copyright the works with the tool. Copyright needs human involvement, how much human involvement is still not hard law, but if you integrate the output of an AI and integrate it into a larger work that is very much covered.

That sounds like ea making an excuse for why they were voted worst company. I don’t doubt that they got those emails and letters but I doubt that was the major reason they got voted worst. That was a year they had a lot of gaming controversies

I try and follow best practices always too, but when the linter is catching it for you it’s less to think about so you can focus on the important parts of the problem