![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/43e66c26-9809-4f90-a45c-6e4cc61685fa.webp)
Who works for who depends on how organized each one is.
Who works for who depends on how organized each one is.
I really want fully on-site jobs. If i work at home then i never get mental separation of work and life, and so i feel like i can never actually live. It happened to me with all of my schooling and honestly with the distress it causes me, I’d be better off not living at all than working at home.
Imagine a plane without gravity.
Like a space ship?
The XBone SAD was my favorite console
This is how YouTube videos are born
I just like vegetables
What’re you talking about? I have 2.3 children, my lifespan is 76.4 years, and i am perfectly neurotypical.
I may have found a phone for you. It’s called the unihertz tank 2
https://www.unihertz.com/products/tank-2
Comes with a few other really interesting features you don’t see on any other phone (like a goddamn laser projector?), though i think the processor is a little underpowered.
I wish thicker bezels were more common tbh. It’s annoying to swipe from the side of the screen when my case is in the way.
Ffs you’re programmers, it’s probably super easy to get another job. It doesn’t have to be like this.
Who’s gonna tell them?
I use it every day on my way to work and most nights before bed.
This sounds like a rather idealistic outcome to me. Sure those things might happen, but dependent and scared wage slaves work for much less cost.
Well the goal of an ideal CEO is to pull more money into the company and give as little out as possible. If we saw more AI CEOs we would just have further wealth disparity in our society and workers at those companies would be paid less as the AI would optimize their pay for maximum company profits. It would be everything we hate about capitalism but amplified, and the person who owned the AI would get paid even more for doing even less.
And more like a nightmare for the rest of us.
Sorry, you’re right, i was being too harsh. when i responded i thought you weren’t speaking in good faith, but i must’ve misinterpreted.
It seems like your response was either trying to waste my time by sending me down a rabbit hole to find the information you didn’t provide, or just being lazy and not caring to so much as check what you were posting. In either case i could do without responses like that cluttering my limited time.
Probably < 1 considering you can pick up on patterns, and learning a pattern generates 1 one structure while allowing you to understand many. The learned pattern itself is likely stored within another pattern. You likely won’t be able to know everything within the brain at once, but you might be able to find anything you want to know.
It’d be like memorizing every book in a library versus going through a library catalog to get what you need.