

For more context, the phrase started as “lead” then was changed by journalists to “lede” in the 70’s to help differentiate between “lead”, “lead”, and “lead”.
My username is a wordplay on the Linux command filesystem check: fsck.
For more context, the phrase started as “lead” then was changed by journalists to “lede” in the 70’s to help differentiate between “lead”, “lead”, and “lead”.
I feel like it would work better if it wasn’t the first or last word. Just fiddle around with different words, and viola!
I prefer the first one the other person posted. It shows off his stupidity when he looked at the sun, and also it looks like he’s kinda happy about it.
Oh wow. Yeah, it hasn’t been updated for 6 years. Damn, I didn’t realize how long I’ve been using it.
Update: I’ve been using this feature in uBlock for a couple of days as a replacement, and it’s really nowhere near the same as uMatrix. I might just keep using uMatrix until it stops working.
We have clear evidence of him doing a Nazi salute. No other evidence is required. He was caught Reich-handed.
Oh, I see. I didn’t think to check the Nazi party registration list. I was under the impression that anyone can be a Nazi by simply doing Nazi things. Good to know there’s a Nazi certification process to keep people in check.
I hope all those people who keep it a secret or generally low-key know that they can’t actually be a Nazi without being certified by the Nazi party.
Like all those people who march around in masks with Nazi flags. They’re not actually Nazis, so we can all feel safe now.
Thanks for that peace of mind.
But Lion-O, Kit and Kat are in trouble!
Just needs an API and an export/import feature.
“It’s not a Nazi salute if it doesn’t come from the Nazi part of Europe, otherwise it’s just a sparkling fascist salute.”
Literally your argument.
uMatrix makes this easy. Made by the creator of uBlock Origin.
This is a great example of where linking to a blog post about an announcement is better than linking to the announcement itself:
after digging a bit deeper, I discovered that there was originally a longer, more detailed announcement that was later scrapped. I found it in a GitLab commit made by Jean. [Link to GitLab comment in article]
Good job, itsfoss.com
I got the idea of the article after looking it over, but the title of this post is really difficult.
Does this sum it up similarly?
TIL that as you increase your walking speed there is a point where walking any faster would take more energy than running
I am really struggling to understand what this title is trying to say.
I’m not sure how this comment is relevant to this conversation. My point is that this post is seeming minimizing the effort required to fight against the different causes of cortisol and may even make the situation worse.
Okay, sure. Still is a valid question, though.
Also, that doesn’t exactly provide concrete and evidence that he didn’t use AI for this. Only that he has experience in writing without it and provides a character reference.
Plus, he should be aware AI is a bad look and makes it seem like it’s possible AI was used elsewhere, like in his writing, even if untrue. If you don’t know about his credentials and history, like myself, then it’s the simplest next step of logic that they could have used AI elsewhere and we can’t know where without him stating where AI is used.
Additionally, in that case, he should be understanding that using AI for his images helps further diminish a field that his own is similarly being diminished by the same tool and using that tool in that way legitimizes that type of use. Basically, if you make money off of what you’re publishing, then just pay an artist. It’s not difficult. Then you can easily avoid people reasonably questioning whether or not you used AI in the creation of the article.
Exactly. This post makes it seem easy. Which can be infuriating when you’re struggling with it already.
Hard to trust any site that uses AI slop in their images.
If they are willing to use AI images, why wouldn’t they be willing to use AI in their writing or in how they interpret the data for their writing?
This whole article could be based on logic or data that AI just hallucinated.
Also yodajammies and imayoda