The Quest’s battery is in the front of the device, but behind layers of electronics, screen and lenses. It would have to do more than catch on fire to cause serious damage.

The quickest way to fix it is to lock and unlock your phone by pressing the power button twice, but not too close together or you launch the camera.

Just moved all my 2FA over to Bitwarden and Bitwarden Authenticator, and deleted my Authy account. I’d already been using it for passwords, so it was a natural fit.

I just want replaceable batteries on my phones again. The last two Samsung phones I owned ended up with swollen batteries, requiring sending them back to Samsung for repairs. I really miss the days of just being able to pop the back off and buying a replacement battery.

The “its own chip” in the headline refers to the S25’s own chip, not Samsung’s own chip.

This is such a shame. I play quite a few games through this that aren’t available on Windows, by enabling Google Play on the system. The Google Play Games thing that Microsoft / Google were working on doesn’t include anywhere near the number of apps I can get running via WSA. I really hope someone is able to bundle this up and release it as a standalone package once Microsoft drop support.

Kicking a phone down a ladder isn’t exactly the intended use case though, so maybe it’s just your fault that your phone screen keeps getting broken. I’ve had large phones for years, and haven’t broken a single screen.

deleted by creator

So out of those users who have both read and voted on this post, 60% voted negatively. It’s safe to assume that the majority of people who did both are those who feel strongly one way or the other about the issue, and statistically it’s more likely that those who disagree will vote, as those who are angry about something tend to be the most vocal. Unfortunately we have no easy way of knowing how many users who read the post don’t care one way or another.

In addition, Lemmy.world has around 21K users per month, and out of those around 1.5K users voted negatively. That’s around 7% of the monthly users who disagree with this news. Hardly a majority.

Do you have any figures to show that the majority of the users on this instance are in favour of piracy? Or do you just assume you’re in the majority?

If every single user of Lemmy.world, or even a significant majority, leaves because they’re no longer able to discuss piracy, I’ll fight both Zuck and Musk in a cage match. It’s all hot air from a very vocal, overly entitled minority.

Sooo… you’d rather someone else do all the work and take on the burdens, but do it the way you want them to do it without contributing in any way?

Why do you assume that only US law applies here?

You’re kidding nobody.

What surprises me is that people think making a community specifically for illegal activity isn’t a problem, and that they should only be called on their behaviour when a copyright holder notices them. There are plenty of places to go for piracy online, so what’s the need to add a community for it here? Or are you people claiming a piracy community wasn’t primarily intended for piracy?