First world problems

Yep. After they started this story they are sucking deep

They were afraid to lose 4% of the audience in Russia and the favor of the Russian government (probably some grants,idk). Now they are afraid to lose those who think that it’s “the right thing to do”.

Btw, it’s not that hard for the Russian government to block every VPN extension like they did with Nord VPN and Surfshark VPN let alone ban Mozilla. This action will help no one and it’s yet another act of virtue signaling

Donated

You can say it like this, or you could’ve just written one word…

Clubhouse

Openwrt bricked 2 of my routers. Be careful

Jokes on you, I don’t believe it today

I have to wonder, don’t the majority of Russians pretty much know that their government is full of shit?

Let me offer my perspective,as a Russian. People do not want to lose everything like they did in the 90s. Yes, everyone understands that the government is full of shit, but they believe in the belief (google it, an interesting concept) that it’s virtuous to support a government.

It’s like a classic trolley problem. Yes, you’d probably push that lever, but you know of consequences and you just purchased a car and your wife is pregnant. You are caught in this unending circle, you simply do not want to deal with it because it doesn’t affect you. But when it does affect you, it’s always the west: shock therapy of the 90s, current sanctions, debit card ban, visa bans, etc.

Yep, thanks for correcting me. In fact, if they write something like

if (day.isWeekend) {...}

The block will never be executed with the old version of library

No, they were probably getting false every time

It is

https://opg.optica.org/ol/fulltext.cfm?uri=ol-49-6-1429&id=547584

You can read their previous papers

Okay, let’s read and find out whether we can find something that we don’t know.

1. There’s no paper, there is no letter, it’s a simple statement at the institute page. The way science is being communicated nowadays is frustrating.

2. From the statement

However, alongside the commercially available C and L-bands, we used two additional spectral bands called E-band and S-band. Such bands traditionally haven’t been required because the C- and L-bands could deliver the required capacity to meet consumer needs.

So they indeed broadened the frequency range.

3. They also did not say anything about limitations. They just pushed this bizarre number everywhere 🤷🏼‍♂️

I don’t understand why, tho I do not have any kind of expertise here.

I suggest (Haven’t read it), this paper proposes to send much denser and broadened signals around one carrier frequency (they use single mode). Due to dispersion they

1. Start to overlap with one each other. If you put more frequencies, you would have more overlaps and I fail to see how it won’t lead to errors.

2. They all arrive at the broader time window, which again could be mitigated either by error correction, or by extending the time window.

It is, but it compromises the speed exponentially with length/broadening

If I lose it, I don’t need it

I’m highly suspicious about group dispersion over long distances. Today’s infrastructure was developed for a certain range of frequencies. Broading it right away wouldn’t be applicable that easy - we would need to introduce error correction which compromises the speed multiplier.

Too lazy to get the original paper though

That’s the different kind of lefties. I am talking about tankies that think that Russia and China are socialist states that fight the big imperialist

[interview question]

Assuming a user is a root, can this user create a file that couldn’t be read or deleted by other roots? …by the same user?

They do and I fucking cringe when they call themselves lefties.