The ones laughing at Bowman’s loss? Yeah, I’m sure they’re crying so hard tonight

Google is so hard! /s

Machin is in a different chamber

Primary or general? General I would expect, given her district

You kidding? If the govt tried that now, the right would call it a conspiracy and double down on hating whatever group the film was about

No, sorry. Only handies

They do care. Just maybe not in the way you meant

Worked in the WH under Bush

Speak for yourself

Trump got a dilute

I mean, she did

Yes, they guy endorsed by party leadership is being primaried by the party itself and not some rando who decided to run /s

Tried googling that and I got were Judith Butler op eds published in the Guardian lol. Unless the creator of queer theory had a massive shift recently, I don’t think that’s terf stuff

He had a rally in Philly today

Ask Jeeves wasn’t an actual person though

Blow my mind how bad some of you are at identifying textbook psychosis

Did you read the article? It’s mostly about how Rahimi relates to Bruen and why that makes it so problematic. Nowhere do they condemn the outcome

The 18th century analogy standard was widely misused. Probably because SCOTUS didn’t make it clear and it’s a strange standard anyway. But yeah, the fifth circuit is a wild one

I had heard of them but had no idea there were so many of them or that they were so successful

Cash rules everything around me