Reported as an invalid news source, because of course it is, however reading the article I’m going to allow it as a “even a broken clock is right twice a day” exception.
The article does a good job explaining why the badge is problematic for him and, despite being intially issued by the Army, was legitimately revoked.
“During the time of his service, the Lone Star rep was working as a civil affairs officer rather than an infantryman or Special Forces soldier, according to CBS.”
Not “this economy” but 20 years ago, I was unemployed and took a part time job running a computer lab at night at a for profit college.
When I got a regular day job, I kept the lab job for extra money.
So I worked IT from 8 to 5, then the computer lab from 6 to 10, Mon-Thur. Normal job on Fri. Off Sat/Sun.
Let’s be honest here… they don’t have a problem with no fault divorce in principal… they have a problem with women being able to file for divorce on their own.
I do kind of miss the private clubs. I had worked my way up through 100K, 150K, 200K and 300K karma clubs before I bailed and came here.
Centennial Club was just the best. It was like Century Club, but way nicer!
Proof he knew what he was doing was wrong and his arguments that he declassified them all are bullshit.
Video links aren’t allowed, articles only.
Obligatory:
A lot of local gun clubs also require NRA membership.
Depends on if they get convicted or not.
I did not see that coming!
“Laying low.”
Removed, civility.
Treason has VERY specific legal definitions, which is why we didn’t see it dropped on any of the January 6th combatants:
US Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
In this case, Treason only applies if the people are working in concert with an entity which has declared war against the United States, or is in open hostility to the United States.
Trump, for all his insanity, hasn’t declared war on the US, so his adherents TECHNICALLY don’t fall under the definition of capital “T” “Treason”.
This is why they get slapped with “sediton” instead. :)
"§2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
§2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)"
For a second there I was thinking “wait, the guys with the fucked up plastic surgery? Well clearly they have a history of good decisions…” but no, that’s the Bogdanoff twins, not the Winklevoss twins.
Weirdly, all involved in crypto…
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wall-street-bets-mourns-loss-151311577.html
Some sort of bizarro universe where explaining how a court ruling doesn’t benefit Biden = wanting to see his dick? 🤔
Are you sure you fully comprehend what it is we’re talking about here?
That was the thing, I needed the MRI to START physical therapy so they knew exactly where the tear was and to what extent it was torn.
So I limped around in agony for a few extra weeks while the doctors explained how they were, in fact, “doctors” and the insurance company was not.
Tendons don’t show up on xrays.
Tore my achilles tendon, doc needed to do an MRI. Insurance company wouldn’t authorize an MRI without an xray first even though literally everyone else knew they don’t show up on xrays.
Statement of fact: Supreme court doesn’t want criminals to be able to get guns.
Abusers are criminals, no guns for them.
Drug users are criminals… what do you suppose their ruling will be?
It’s not going to benefit Hunter in the slightest.
“You can’t get divorced until I say so!” Yeesh.