• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 6 個月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年10月24日

help-circle

  • I think they see the slippery slope emerge, and they take that slope to the logical extreme. The centralized gatekeeper for attestation, play integrity, etc, the EU sees it as mitigating security risks with Google, the corporations see it as opportunity to change the centralized gatekeeper; to maximize capital. It isn’t just a (terrible) strategic move for security, it’s also a move to align capital. (also imagine the meta data network you could create with the attestation, another data point for surveillance. think Chat Control) I see GrapheneOS prioritize security; not capital. The people/groups/companies they are often at odds with prioritize the mechanisms of capital (or surveillance capitalism) over security.





  • If Signal leaves the official app stores

    I know this is probably semantics; but I don’t think it will be completely on Signal, ie the app store owner is the one who is going to have the pressure to remove the apps: plural, as they will likely also remove any alternatives in the same vain. Same with any other service provider, store front, internet or cellular access, or device maker…

    • There is no strictly defined “scope” of what ChatCountrol covers. It’s as broad as scanning “communications”. And includes things like Client-Side Scanning.
      • Pre-encryption scanning - Content is analyzed before it gets encrypted
      • Device-level analysis - Scanning occurs on the sender’s device before transmission
      • End-to-end encrypted services - Even encrypted communications are subject to scanning requirements

    What I mean by Signal complying by leaving, is that they stop allowing registration of phone numbers ‘from’ these countries, and stop hosting any of their infrastructure (AWS) within these boarders.

    Self-Hosted or Federated, is only a small portion of the battle. You have a bigger problem.








  • Who benefits?

    Who benefits from sowing a narrative around “drama”, “accusation”, and/or “paranoia”. Seriously.

    I think given the following circumspect; GrapheneOS’s reaction, to move project pieces out of potential hostile environments/jurisdiction, is perfectly reasonable.

    1. France’s Support for EU “Chat Control”, scanning proposals. France has been one of the governments most supportive of EU‑level proposals that would require scanning of communications and devices for illegal content.

    2. The general French framing and approach to cybercrime. As in other EU countries, French authorities are pushing for: Expanded powers to compel cooperation from service providers, and developers. Strong rhetoric against tools that are seen as systematically obstructing investigations.





  • I think the gatekeeping part isn’t the warning or cautionary advice being given, It’s the failure to point, and give direction to, the relevant thing(s), the skill sets, the place to start in order to understand the complexities.

    Like the hart-surgeon analogy given elsewhere in the comments; it’s not just the dire warning of ‘you can kill someone’ - it’s the humanity to say, well if you want to learn how to do this, you’re going to have to start by having an understanding of basic biology, organic chemistry, human anatomy, etc, and to learn about those things go here…




  • Check out the ‘dx’ variants within universal blue It would be a good time to become familiar with rebasing.

    I run bluefin-dx environment. (gnome).

    There is a different learning curve to immutable/atomic systems and workflows. I don’t think it’s harder per say, it’s just you’ll have to be cognizant of the differences when searching for relative and relevant information when you come up against anything (like any opinionated *nix distro). Learn Homebrew, and Flatpack (and thier quarks running with atomic systems).