if it were effective at reducing industrial impacts you might be right.

theses are all in the same thread? can you link it?

the first two certainly appear to be doing it, but without context, it is hard to say. the third explicitly said one is worse

everyone can see the whole thread. I don’t know who you think you’re fooling.

everyone can see how you othered foreigners of russian descent

https://mastodon.social/@Cryophilia@lemmy.world/112047426325648689

everyone can see who was throwing around insults and xenophobia

I can see the whole exchange from my mastodon accounts

I don’t see any insults but yours there.

This sub annd that clown deserve each other. Blocking both.

does anyone believe this is true?

there is a lot to unpack there, but i don’t see the point. you said you were done so … leave.

I assumed everyone here had a similar level of reading comprehension. that was my mistake. have a nice night.

my whole comment was a hypothetical. so… bye.

your mockery still doesn’t change the facts

ok. you look up hypothetical, and we can meet back here to discuss!!

in this hypothtical, those are the other two options. I would know: I wrote the hypothetical

your mockery doesn’t change whether it’s a voter suppression tactic

I wasn’t arguing about the definition of genocide. it’s a pretty outlandish hypothetical for you to be worried about that.

I think we just have different ideas of what voter suppression looks like.

if on election day, an hour after teh polls open, everyone calls the election for cornel west, and people say “you can vote for one of the genocidal maniacs, but it won’t matter. they can’t possibly win”, no one would characterize that any way except voter suppression.

if you have something to say, say it. I don’t care for your interrogative style.