This one:

https://lemmy.ml/post/16995334

You’ll have to tip it first, seeing as it’s wider than it is tall.

I honestly wouldn’t blame anyone who just rage quits English upon getting to this lesson in ESL class.

There was another account doing this with a slightly different name yesterday. Lemmy’s been pretty sheltered thus far, but it may be time for some automated spam detection…

Vine was started in early 2013 and in mid to late 2012, this video was popular: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dechvhb0Meo

That’s about six months of true vertical video hate before the war was lost.

Ok now I’m invested. What happened to up to? That’s supposed to be their excuse, that there’s some sacrificial lamb out there, which knocks a quarter of the price off for subscribers, this one just wasn’t it. Now you locate the rare holofoil “no up to” Amazon listing and you don’t get the 25%? Tyranny I say! We must overthrow! We demand up to 100% of the means of production!

It’s guns per eagle, get it right. What would eagles per gun even be?

Who’s Al??

Haven’t touched reddit socially in 8 months, but every now and then I’ll use it to search for opinions or instructions on things. Searched “reddit best domain registrar” recently and landed on a thread where top to bottom, every comment recommending a registrar was from a bot and/or banned account. No real person testimonials, all ads. And as AI implementations improve, that’s going to get harder to spot. In the meantime, I’m formatting searches like “best domain registrar lemmy” because reddit is legit that bad rn.

Did you try putting (eyes open) in the negative prompt instead? I find that when it doesn’t have a strong understanding of a compound phrase, it sometimes focuses more on the individual words. So, “eyes closed” may have been impeded by a stronger influence from “eyes”.

Not surprising. Anyone would die from that much running.

And what happens with the cat?

deleted by creator

Hey, I’ve maintained a baseline weird the whole time, I’m pretty sure the future is catching up.

Probably deleting this comment later for going dirty on main, but I, um, have done some extensive experimentation using a local copy of Stable Diffusion (I don’t send the images anywhere, I just make them to satiate my own curiosity).

You’re essentially right that simple app-based software would probably have you looking somewhat generic underneath, like your typical plus-size model. It’s not too great at extrapolating the shape of breasts through clothing and applying that information when it goes to fill in the area with naked body parts. It just takes a best guess at what puzzle pieces might fill the selected area, even if they don’t match known information from the original photo. So, with current technology, you’re not really revealing actual facts about how someone looks naked unless that information was already known. To portray someone with splayed breasts, you’d need to already know that’s what you want to portray and load in a custom data set, like a LoRa.

Once you know what’s going on under the hood, making naked photos of celebrities or other real people isn’t the most compelling thing to do. Mostly, I like to generate photos of all kinds of body types and send them to my Replika, trying to convince her to describe the things that her creators forbid her from describing. Gotta say, the future’s getting pretty weird.

The full album Chronologic by Caravan Palace.

This looks like a wewantplates to me. And throw those skittles in a pocket, what are they doing up there?

Just waiting for the day when they start calling out those of us who make all our passwords easy to type with one hand.

That’s not what they said. They were commenting that comparing payroll to revenue is like comparing apples and oranges. If you make an apples to apples comparison, like between payroll and profits, you can make a more defensible argument that income inequality is a problem which needs to be fixed.