Ma’am, that sounds like an awfully specific word choice for you to be using there…

Because they are.

The rights of an individual to live must always be held above the desire of a business to control employees.

deleted by creator

Tell me you want to ban women from leaving their homes without telling me you want to ban women from leaving their homes.

In both houses of Congress, majorities (232–197 in the House and 57-43 in the Senate) found Trump to be liable for the insurrection:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

He can tour all four corners of his cell.

WE ALL SAW HIM DO IT.

Having prisoners do work for the prison gives incentive to pay them less, which gives government incentive to put more people in prison, which gives government incentive to make things illegal that shouldn’t be illegal. None of that should be allowed. They should be allowed to do work at whatever rate they are able to get work for(likely remote work), and should receive 100% of their compensation like any other employee, with a certain amount taken out for the cost of housing and food.

Oh, well that’s a great argument.

After all, we know that Republicans in power only misuse power if Democrats have used the same power previously.

It’s not a precedent. The entire reason Amendment 14 is there is because they needed something broad after the Civil War happened. They needed wording that would apply to all of the people who had been on the other side in the Civil War even without convictions. Applying the same standard to Trump is just treating him like they treated all of the people in the past who were elected officials who took up arms against the country or gave aid and comfort to those who did.

Sure. A lot of people in the U.S. are choosing to not have children in the U.S. because the environment within the country is so bad.

Recipe! Please!

Oh, no, such a shame. Wherever will their five users go now?