I’m all for teaching tech literacy. It’s one of the most important skills. However, if a task is about writing your own thoughts in your own words then maybe you should prevent cheating by limiting access to tools like llms or have better supervision.
If the task involves using technology then the task should be adapted so you still need your own mind to solve it (obviously).
Yeah true. The blacklisting goes way too far.
I think it’s not so steep if students are told beforehand. Tell them what counts as cheating. Tell them the consequences. Tell them it’s serious.
In university I always had to sign a little text that informed us that we are not allowed to cheat and that doing so would lead to failing the test and potentially getting expelled.
It sounds silly but “running the program from your head” is a super important skill as a programmer. It’s what you do when you read and try to understand other people’s code.
Or at least give students computers that have restricted or no access to the internet? Even before LLMs having access to the internet would have been a huge opportunity to cheat. At least in most subjects.
Also, what happened to teachers/supervisors walking around and checking if the students cheat? Back when I went to school we also cheated with cheat sheets or exchanging answers but it was always risky because getting busted meant failing the test (or worse).
Letting students use the internet unrestrictedly would be like the teacher leaving the room and leaving us unsupervised for the duration of the test back in my days.
I get the frustration. However, the satisfaction to build something this way weighed always bigger when the project was completed and working. At least for me.
Now show me the same for the mattress-to-pee-ratio.
so drinking breast milk from your own “species” is considered weird when drinking breast milk from other animals is just fine? smh
You might get a better result with 6min/240 but the same Pizza should be fine as well at 180 for a bit longer.
twist: Microsoft already built data centers and servers on Mars.
I’d throw in the post below
With the results of chat out of the box I kind of agree with you that mistral feels behind.
However, there are some features that I really like and make the experience even better than chatgpt.
(I have never tried the paid version of any LLM chat so I can only compare free tiers)
I read another article before which did not mention the script but only listed all affected packages. So yeah I should read this article :)
How do you guys check against that list? Especially when people have so many aur packages. I simply searched the list for each package manually but I only have 5. Do you write scripts?
Reusing them, even in small experimental projects, underscores a broader sustainability opportunity.
Bigger opportunity would be banning this shit.
I genuinely think that being able to name your own invention or discovery is a big driver for scientific progress.
See the Cox Zucker Machine!
“A few weeks after we met, we realized that we had to write a joint paper because the combination of our last names, in the usual alphabetical order, is remarkably obscene.”
The great cosmos KNEW the time you would watch it and produced the video in advance!
To me this feels like every big YouTuber who at one point mentiones that “all the negative comments are affecting their mental health.” But all I see are positive comments and like ratios over 90%.
Well, I think it’s not wrong to apply the same rules to any kind of vessel you take into the water. Therefore, it’s good to simply assume that every vessel in the water is some kind of boat so people don’t say ‘well akshually this is not a boat’ and do bullshit like this cybertruck driver.
You’re right, you definitely should treat sex offenders way harsher.
Also if a school says “don’t do X or you WILL fail the test and MIGHT get expelled” and then you proceed to do X then I think it’s on you and not ‘bad treatment’ at all. Especially if you do X repeatedly.