I googled it instead of chatgpting it. Crazy I know

On September 11, 1973, a pivotal event occurred in Chile that had profound political and historical implications:

The 1973 Chilean Coup d’État

and so on.

So that clearly works.

Apparently nothing happened on June 4th 1989

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquisition_of_Twitter_by_Elon_Musk

The Company isnt publicly traded anymore, so he bought the entire thing. 9% was just the start.

The business magnate Elon Musk initiated an acquisition of American social media company Twitter, Inc. on April 14, 2022, and concluded it on October 27, 2022. Musk had begun buying shares of the company in January 2022, becoming its largest shareholder by April with a 9.1 percent ownership stake. Twitter invited Musk to join its board of directors, an offer he initially accepted before declining. On April 14, Musk made an unsolicited offer to purchase the company, to which Twitter’s board responded with a “poison pill” strategy to resist a hostile takeover before unanimously accepting Musk’s buyout offer of $44 billion on April 25.

Well i got 6 KWH in December and the highest of the year was 81.4 KWH in June. I’m just saying that getting closer to fully consuming what you produce is much more worth than going into the grid/batterys. We also don’t produce to get to 0 KWH by external sources but that isnt the goal.

Well we are a 2 person household basically, what do you do to consume the power of 8 panels on sunny days?

4 Solar Panels are plenty, I have 2 and on sunny days you get much more than you can consume. I would recommend just getting 2 aswell (I got 870Watt peak in total) because everything else would require either some form of battery or would involve giving the energy into the power grid. Also in Germany there is a 800W limit for easier registration aswell.

“This single thing is more expensive in this country” is a stupid way to compare prices from countries.

Well maybe Odd is the wrong word, too small and biased?

There should be statistics how many cars are sold and then you could collect data from repairshops instead of users from a website. Even if a user has 3 cars, asking 1 repairshop will give you data for 100’s of cars. Its just odd to do a survey on the users of your website because thats probably a small and skewed sample size.

Edit: “We had insufficient data to create brand rankings for Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Infiniti, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Lucid, Maserati, Mercedes-Benz, Mini, Mitsubishi, Polestar, Porsche, and Ram.” Gives you a hint on how sufficient their data is in total.

Good point but still questionable methodology.

This basically defines most reliable as “least issues in first 3 years”. Also why would you collect them as a survey of your members and not try to get a broader statistic.

“based on CR member surveys” so its what people think is most reliable. Not what is actually most reliable.

They usually do surveys with ranked choice voting and then you can assume who wouldve voted for dem/rep if the third party didnt exist.