• 0 Posts
  • 791 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This was a shockingly good result when compared to the cost of producing this with a set, film crew, actors, costume/makeup, and post production.

    It doesn’t have to be perfect, it has to be good enough to get your attention between the latest streaming show you or your kid is watching. It will absolutely do that for a tiny tiny fraction of the cost businesses had to pay before.



  • I can think of one valid use case for this unsolved by any other solution:

    Lets say a company has an SoC board base product currently currently base on ARM. They want to eventually migrate to RISC-V based solution.

    If a company has a product currently written to use ARM compiled code, but wants to transition to RISC-V (which isn’t ready yet), they could deploy this board which could run today’s ARM implementation, and it would be future-ready when the RISC-V implementation would be released without having to replace hardware.




  • Just because a Ford truck weighs a lot doesn’t mean we shouldn’t address EV tire wear.

    I agree. However, this started with a highlighting of EV tire pollution. Arguably mainstream EVs entered production in 2012. F-150 and other trucks of equal or more weight have been on the road since about the late 1970s. Why is it this is an EV tire pollution discussion only?

    Do a lot of people own trucks that shouldn’t because they don’t use them as trucks? Yes.

    We agree.

    I’d argue that’s a completely different argument.

    How so? Are you arguing that a truck that weighs the same the produces equal tire pollution is okay, but an EV that weighs the same with equal tire pollution isn’t okay?

    This isn’t an EV only issue, but it is highlighted for EVs because they go through tires faster than equivalent sized (not weight) vehicles.

    Isn’t this following the same flawed logic that trucks shouldn’t have to get high MPG efficiency because they are trucks, while ICE cars are held to higher efficiency standards? Your logic seems to suggest we could solve this EV tire pollution problem by simply eliminating EV cars and only driving EV trucks because then they’d get a pass on tire pollution like current ICE trucks do.

    In the end I would hope all vehicles would be equipped with tires that don’t kill aquatic life!

    I agree, but your other statements prior seem to give a pass to ICE (or EV trucks).



  • Why not just compare the model 3 to an 18-wheeler then? Those weigh way more. Would have made his point better.

    And it’s a completely meaningful comparison, as long as you throw away the fact that different vehicles are used for different things.

    They’re designed for different things. While I’ll agree that the many F-150 drivers are using them for their appropriate grade of work or towing, I’m guessing there are more F-150s that are used as grocery-getting-pavement-princesses than all the Tesla Model 3s ever sold.

    In that way, F-150 is identical to Tesla Model 3 as far as use case.