Another one bites the dust?

I’ve seen this mentioned a few times before but never get how it works. How do you even use TikTok as a search engine?

The only evidence to overturn the election points to republicans

Bad bot

Wat

Then you are totally locked in with Apple devices and cannot switch to Android and take your passkeys with you

Typical 1-off error

Now thinking about it in terms of mathematical logic, the DoJ and Supreme Court‘s interpretations is wrong:

It’s actually a law of logic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws) that says that:

not (A and B and C)

is equal to

(not A) or (not B) or (not C)

—

In this case:

The defendant is eligible for relief if he does not (A and B and C)

Which is the same as

The defendant is a eligible for relief if he does (not A) or (not B) or (not C)

—

Which is not what the DoJ is saying. The DoJ is saying that

not (A and B and C)

is equal to

(not A) and (not B) and (not C)

Right! I feel like I’m going crazy because I don’t see how can you interpret it the other way!

lower courts were sharply divided on the vital question of whether “and” bundles the conditions—as in, you don’t have (A), don’t have (B), and don’t have ©—which would mean a defendant who lacked any one of these conditions would be eligible for relief. The alternative reading, advocated by the Justice Department, holds that “and” really means “or”—that a defendant who met even one of the conditions would not be eligible for relief

The reporter seems to be getting this totally wrong. It’s like he is saying the exact opposite of what I understand. From my point of view:

If a defendant would be elegible for relief if he lacked any one of the conditions, that is actually interpreting that AND means OR.

If a defendant would be eligible for relief if he lacked all of the conditions, that is interpreting that AND means AND.

Once

That’s a single datapoint. You should probably get more to be sure

Great news! Web apps represent the democratization of mobile apps, empowering independent developers free from the constraints of the App Stores

There’s already like seven countries with territorial claims in Antarctica

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_claims_in_Antarctica

That’s not how extends works 😂 you silly goose

Also the de-jure standard in the EU

Also I would like to be able to follow a Mastodon user from Lemmy

Since it says “worldwide”, I want to point out that Steamboat Willie is in the public domain in the United States, but that doesn’t mean that it is elsewhere. For example, in Europe the law sets a copyright term of author death + 70 years so Steamboat Willie won’t be in the public domain there until 2036. So Disney is free to copyright strike Steamboat Willie outside the US however they want.

Play lots of AAA games

Of course YouTube should be able to put ads on it. That’s public domain. You can do with it whatever you want.

That’s exactly the same marketing plan as Neflix/Amazon prime/HBO Max… whatever. You download a FREE app but can’t do anything with it without a subscription.