It depends on how they wrote the law, the destructive device rule is fairly good imo as it both covers the things congress wants and anything that is using a different name for the same result and gives the attorney general the ability to exclude things for sporting only.

(4) The term “destructive device” means— (A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas— (i) bomb, (ii) grenade, (iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (v) mine, or (vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses; (B) any type of weapon (other than a shotgun or a shotgun shell which the Attorney General finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes) by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and © any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled. The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon; any device, although originally designed for use as a weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic, line throwing, safety, or similar device; surplus ordnance sold, loaned, or given by the Secretary of the Army pursuant to the provisions of section 7684(2), 7685, or 7686 of title 10; or any other device which the Attorney General finds is not likely to be used as a weapon, is an antique, or is a rifle which the owner intends to use solely for sporting, recreational or cultural purposes.

This ruling doesn’t stop the ability to delegate. It stops the deference to the executive branch to interpret however they feel. If their interpretation is good, it can stand. Congress doesn’t have to say how much heavy metal is acceptable in drinking water, it just has to explicitly say setting a limit is the responsibility of the agency.

Eliminating time zones doesn’t make scheduling meetings easier it just changes the language. Instead of figuring out what time it is elsewhere you have to remember what normal working hours are, Europe, US, and Japan aren’t all going to be available 9-5 UTC. It’s just as easy to suggest a meeting at functionally midnight without time zones.

The new pro-Biden platform is that it was all about a cold making his voice soft. Of course they are going to ignore the actual issues. A real primary would have made things much more obvious, when you had him on stage with some 40 and 50 year old folks.

This wasn’t as bad as Carter, but it definitely was bad.

I’m saying if you say “fuck you rights” to bad people it’s easier for the government to fuck everyone’s rights

If he was going to be that bad the democratic party shouldn’t have fought having a real primary.

Using examples like this to erode rights is how the nazis got public support to become nazis.

Truth doesn’t really matter in a presidential debate, it’s not actually a debate. It’s all about appearing superior than your opponent.

They absolutely needed to. Biden can’t hide behind Covid protocol this time, he needs to be publicly visible far more in this campaign. Also whether it was mutual or not, Trump would use no debates as an attack against Biden.

Yes. 90% of the time is almost always off topic. Sometimes a candidate spends a whole sentence saying something related, but that’s as close to organized as it ever was.

Trump definitely does more personal attacks, but that’s about it. I’ve seen a moderator make a correcting statement once.

From inside sure, most cars have an override in the handle. It doesn’t change the lockout problem.

I haven’t has a car with mechanical locks in a long time. I’ve also not had a battery so dead the locks didn’t work.

A full on right to roam is probably a bit extreme, but I could see a minimal right of way being required around public lands.

There’s about the same number of foods that are actually from Europe, as there are foods that immigrants made theirs once they got here.

It’s Irish American, I doubt it has anything to do with Ireland.

Start looking for a new job. The culture is going to change and the expectations are going to change. You can try and leverage more money or promotions, but you are going to be in a company we’re the majority are people that can’t leave.

Banks would go out of business and credit unions would look a lot more like banks. This is assuming both business and personal accounts move. If just personal accounts move, not much happens.

Why would corporate influence increase with term limits? It’s way easier to influence the same person for 30 years than a new person every 5-10 years.

It requires years of procedural understanding because there’s no term limits. There isn’t benefit to that excessive procedure apart from making junior representatives lives more difficult. Congress can make their own rules, and they make them benefit those who have been there for 30 years. A term limited Congress can make rules that work better for them.