I’m interested in learning more about your perspective

Exactly!

Honestly, that’s fair. AFAIK the founding fathers were mostly capitalists and they made the rules to protect themselves.

That said, I think in the timeline of human history, we’re converging towards better governance and I think the US constitution is largely a step in the right direction.

But also it’s more abstract and if you look at it, it’s not that bad.

I’m not American thought.

Sorry m8te, I don’t know who you are so not sure when you’re being sarcastic! I rely on “/s” these days but I hear ya now load and clear. Hope you have a sick/awesome day!

I know.

Edit: Oh you’re the op of this comment. I think we’re in agreement

I don’t really get your point, but I think that’s a UN thing. I actually like paper straws. More nucleation points make the drink taste fizzier. Unless it’s a smoothie….

What’re you talking about? What happened in 1952?

I have to disagree, I don’t think it’s meaningless. I think that’s unfair. But it certainly is overhyped. Maybe just a semantic difference?

Hahaha 😂 10/10 meme

I’m not a big fan of that but I did notice there’s a new 2025 model y. At this point if you buy a Tesla you have it coming. If I saw someone destroying that I would look the other way.

Welcome to reality

I agree. It’s just a matter of semantics.

I mean at this rate… wait another month 😞

Which makes them bullshit, no?

100%!

I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently.

What you say is completely constitutional, but not legal. Laws are only here to maintain control, the constitution is more abstract.

Been thinking about this a lot. They can say it’s terrorism. History is written by the winners.

But…

Rebellion is constitutional, but not legal. If you rebel, you die a terrorist or live a hero. Not much middle ground.

I’ve never been a violent person, but I think I agree with you. Sad times.