• 3 Posts
  • 254 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2024

help-circle



  • Either your argument is that morality is somehow “god given” through religion, in which case I have to ask, which god? Which religion? There’s a lot of those around or no longer around, with different nuances of morality, contradicting that idea.

    Or each civilization developed religion and incorporated their respectove ideas about morality, but then morality necessarily precedes religiosity.

    Either way, doesn’t make sense.

    Besides, the idea that a fear of god is necessary to make people “moral” is ridiculous. If you would commit immoral atrocities if you didn’t believe in god, then I’m sorry, that makes you a bad person; but don’t project that unto other people.

    Empathy is sufficient for morality, while god, arguably, is an amoral monster.

    Cheers, a moral atheist

















  • I think that at the bare minumum, the PORN<->GOV connection must not occur. How about this (simplified):

    • USER visits porn site
    • PORN site encrypts random nonce + “is this user 18?” with GOV pubkey
    • PORN forwards that to USER
    • USER forwards that to GOV, together with something authenticating themselves (need to have GOV account)
    • GOV knows user is requesting, but not what for
    • GOV checks: is user 18?, concats answer with random nonce from PORN, hashes that with known algo, signs the entire thing with its private signing key
    • GOV returns that to USER
    • USER forwards that to PORN
    • PORN is able to verify that whoever made the request to visit PORN is verified as older than 18 by singing key holder / GOV, by checking certificate chain, and gets freshness guarantee from random nonce
    • but PORN does not know anything about the user

    There’s probably glaring issues with this, this is just from the top of my head to solve the problem of “GOV should know nothing”.