It’s free after you pay for it.
It’s a one-time fee that you pay monthly. One-time in that you pay one time a month.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrccTMwoLv8&pp=ygUUUG9ydGxhbmRpYSBidXkgcGhvbmU%3D
It’s free after you pay for it.
It’s a one-time fee that you pay monthly. One-time in that you pay one time a month.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrccTMwoLv8&pp=ygUUUG9ydGxhbmRpYSBidXkgcGhvbmU%3D
Right, the charges aren’t absurd at all. No one is above the law; not Hunter, not Trump. It applies to everyone. The evidence was provided to a jury of his peers, and they determined that that evidence proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
You’re saying we could reactivate the gene and get infinite teeth?? 🫨
Wait long enough and you get the real certificate
That’s why surveillance has been, is, and will always be an issue and something to be concerned about.
All it takes is a concentrated power system to abuse that power and use surveillance to their benefit.
Could you imagine if the Nazi’s had the amount of data, information, and surveillance capabilities of modern day US?
No one single word can represent someone’s entire world view. It’s simply not possible.
The administration has actually done quite a bit in the background surprisingly. You do need to dig for it though
I think it’s flawed to say that something is moral if it is legal and vice versa.
I think the headline and first few sentences of the article are purposely misleading. They bank on their audiences only reading the headline or a portion of the article in order to make people jump to conclusions, instead of putting the conclusion or main point in the headline.
Be real; what is the first thing you think of when you read that headline? I think most people would assume people are walking out because he said or did something to make them walk out. Not because of the weather. It’s really news worthy that people left a rally because it was cold? C’mon now.
Yes- it’s on audiences to critically think about what they read, but journalism like this certainly doesn’t help. And they know this.
Obviously subjective, but to me that is unethical journalism.
Yeah seriously. As much as I would love to think his fans were walking out on him, that is not the case.
Are there no ethical standards for journalism?
Well of course! The only possible discourse we can have about the topic is if we assume capitalism is the best and only political economic model we can have.
Oh I thought those were like rotten strawberries at first haha. Looks delicious!
In the moment, you’re not 100% certain the guy wanted to be on fire. The only thing you can do in this case at least is attempt to extinguish.
Thanks!
Is there any service like onerep that is reputable and folks could recommend? Luckily I didn’t use onerep, but would like a similar service to explore.
To help justify the manager’s job.
As is often the case with sensationalist media coverage
Don’t be dissing my silly putty like that 😤. At least silly putty can be molded to be tolerant toward others.