you would betray them if you punish “russians” collecting a group of people and calling them “russians”, state members, regardless of self identification is nationalistic, you are the nationalist if that is what you do.
“russians betrayed machno”, no it was the bolsheviks, the living bolsheviks alive then, not now
No I do not expect you to show more than they do, but they are not one person, whilst a description of the world might contain a structure of social relations, the notion of nations is a prescription.
You are betraying all of the people who are against the war or are avoiding making themselves into nationalist cogs, your efforts should not be support of sanctions but maintenance of communication with anarchists and growth of horizontal governance both where you are and elsewhere.
You should be more responsible
Please instead of this, work to maintain worker councils and establish communication between them, in all regions of the world, especially a place like the russian region
Oh but we can go and pretend that all people are like the soldiers too. There are some beautiful people that have the misfortune of being born into the russian polity
Pro eu dogmatism is foolishness, construction of 2 sides is foolish.
Critique of the dear brussels leader is not support of the kremlin.
People should be better than siloing the responsibility for their mind away to some temporary heartless representative.
Ignore the disconnect between people affected by these ham fisted measures and the people that should be punished, strongly including those in the kremlin, and you are abandoning your responsibility to mankind.
So glad the “russian” people will be forced by these sanctions to… elect… a … differ… … oh…
Just because the nationalists claim working class aesthetics, it doesnt change anything, this hypothetical educated individual is capable of betraying the working class with nationalist politics, and to say that applying the same brush to different regions is naive is just to provide room for the true naive statement that those “unreported” regions are better suited for nationalism.
And you assumed my position on ukraine without asking, or in fact the general anarchist stance. Anarchists do not support ukranian nationalism despite the common desire between anarchists to prefer to support individuals in the ukranian nationalist supported region.
But it is not always true, and I hope that anarchists develop ties across the nationalist drawn borders. There are clearly wonderful people squandered in the russian region. Please do not mistake the brave individuals in organisations such as “solidarity collectives” for idiots rather than people forced by the ukranian nationalists into allying with the ukranian nationalists under their circumstance. In any case they clearly try to maintain seperation if you follow their efforts and if you would analyse the situation outside of a big money news corp line, it is clear that the choice to shoot and bomb the incoming soldiers is sensical, despite their class interest.
That then does not make those people nationalists, and people in less stressed theoretical circumstance absolutely should not propose nationalism in their name. And I do not like your line of singling out ukraine to this as to slyly construct a racist strawman.
Well maybe they could be less attached to their homes and move, or rally elsewhere and return, but it is not silly to be attached to a loved environment.
( the above comment was edited by “OBJECTION!” and mine was a response to the original)
the national identity is their tie to their local oppressors, they are not close to it one bit There is nuance in many things, even dead ends
I just scrolled for 2 seconds on the front page, unless they have all been deleted or something in reaction
But what benefit does constant refutation have really, the individuals in leninist dominated regions are sufficiently supported by their support under the conception of the international proletariat, they are not intrinsically members of a nation and the support of that nation does not translate into their liberation.
The statements in the last paragraph are reasonable, they are just truthful, they are not trying to divert effort towards dictatorship, just contextualise the world, it is easy to note the difference in my opinion
Please feel free to post any problems you have, maybe slightly accumulated if you find yourself having many
Um I would genuinely just read through the manuals for guile and guix, they contain most of the information needed. The guile manual does explain in an introductory section all the basic building blocks you will need. If you will be writing packages, first make sure you have learnt about s-expressions ( they are very cool, think python ast library but foundational to the language), and then read the section in the guix manual about g-expressions.
Probably just download the guix, guile, shepherd and guix cookbook pdfs to have them on hand, or just use the internet to get the ones synced with master branch
There is a guix guile primer available: https://guix.gnu.org/cookbook/en/html_node/A-Scheme-Crash-Course.html
Make sure to read other peoples configs if you can. There are blog posts on the guix website explaining more complex concepts if you ever need them like the monad implementation and how the store works, also how to package rust packages.
Dont worry if youre original asahi setup takes a long time to get together, it took me about 3 months or more before my guix setup was all on par with my fedora one ( waiting for things to be packaged and stuff). But after that 3 months, i have it for life, so when I die I will have saved quite a bit of time i think
temple os reference? ( it had a section for unfun games iirc)
And the leftist parties were just continuing the bolshevik trend of painting moscow dictatorship in red paint
China IS authoritarian, as in so far as we are talking about the relations people have with the government
Do not go around supporting dictators just because they arent in the us
ah ok probably meant to write “unvendors”
sorry what is “uncendors”?
You do not seem capable of modelling the world in sufficient detail for compassion and you should be nowhere near a violence monopoly.
You use the abstraction of russia to include people who are not self identified russians, this boar headedness is dangerous