• 9 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 29 days ago
cake
Cake day: April 12th, 2026

help-circle

  • a specific internal conflict some men experience where they view women as belonging to one of two mutually exclusive categories: the “saintly” Madonna or the “debased” whore.

    my posting style makes these men think that I’m obviously trying to scam/catfish/sell something (whore) because obviously a woman who isn’t wouldn’t be on here posting stuff like that in the first place (Madonna).

    i also find it quite funny cause if you’ve seen my posts and comments you can deduce that money is not something i lack… i do love attention and being an entertaining court jester but i do it purely for the love of the game, lol. also a slut purely for the love of the game.



















  • The Culkin defense never made much sense anyway. For a practical, personal example: if one of my dad’s wealthy friends was accused of child molestation by multiple children, me saying, “Oh, but he never did anything to me,” wouldn’t discredit the victims at all. As the child of a friend (and same circles), I would clearly be of a “higher status” and therefore protected.

    Culkin was a famous child; predators are often selective with their victims. The argument here is that MJ targeted “lower class” children while treating famous ones well. That way, if accusations ever surfaced, the less privileged kids would be branded as money-hungry liars because the famous ones would publicly insist, “He treated me well.”


  • violet08_@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    I can’t take any opinions on this topic from people on here seriously anymore when so many were in the trenches fighting for Michael Jackson using the same defense lines as MAGA uses for Trump: extortion, greedy fake victims, hit job by some enemy, circumstantial evidence, and no conviction, etc. People don’t actually give a shit about child abuse or pedophiles, lol.




  • It matched the description of his dick, except for the question of whether he was circumcised. Prosecutors also raised concerns that Jackson may have altered his dick during his “media break” in Europe, when the allegations of molestation emerged. During that time, he went into hiding for several months. There is also uncertainty about whether Jordan mentioned circumcision at all, since none of the sources that confirmed the match refer to it. Lauren Weis, who took the original description and is now a judge, later confirmed the match on the Telephone Stories podcast. Lead investigator Bill Dworin also confirmed it. Dermatologist Dr. Strick, who examined Jackson during the strip search, documented the presence of unusual markings. District Attorney Tom Sneddon also confirmed it.