Te Hina Rehua-Whare, her partner Kaedyn James Broughton Lee Wiremu Barber-Salvation, and two other random fucks we don’t have names for. These violent cunts should be rotting in a cell. Fuck it, deport them to America; it’s the shithole they belong in.
It’s really atmospheric and the dialogue is well written, the combat is fun and challenging. It’s paced more like the single player content in Warframe, which is to say that (at least in the beta) I never got to the point that I was slinging myself across the map evaporating anything in my path.
Thank God you asked us first, or you might end up looking like you opened the Ark of the Covenant.
Hound the landlord; this is a habitability issue and interferes with the quiet enjoyment of your residence… A lawyer would love to help convince anyone who gives you shit about fixing it.
This is a cool project, I have quite a few questions! Are you planning an “app store” repo of supported software? Allowing us to add our own repos? Can i set up a reverse proxy/VPN tunneling using my own hardware, or is remote access only available through a Safebox subscription? If I can set it up is that manual, guided, or automatic? Why Docker instead of Podman?
My concern is in regards to AI… I think many are relying more and more on it. Making such content a waste of my time in this perspective.
Another way to frame this is “I don’t have anything new to add to what AI would write on the subject”.
Don’t you? Then why are you thinking about writing a blog? Even if it’s just a documentation of your projects, it’ll be your perspective. AI can’t write that, so people who want to read your blog aren’t going to get it from AI.
So then if the bucket is moving in a counter clockwise direction, the “left” wall of the bucket would be the thing acting on the water. Wouldn’t that cause the water to stick to the left wall of the bucket, not the bottom?
It might help to remember that “left” and “bottom” are different depending on where you’re standing. The water keeps moving in the direction the original force got it moving, but as the bucket traces the circular path, the “left” and “bottom” walls are now in different positions relative to the water. Remember, you don’t see the water sitting peacefully on the “bottom” of the bucket like you would if it were standing at rest; the water is forced in the “bottom left corner” of the bucket while it spins, because the water always being accelerated (by the bucket) tangent to the direction its already moving.
Also, the bucket is absolutely experiencing the force of the water acting on it - right from the start of the string pulling taut, the water has been pushing on the bucket’s walls (and even before, actually, the whole time the water is in the bucket). But that’s not really relevant.
I’m not quite sure I get how fictitious anti particles relate to fictitious forces.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to muddy the water - I was just trying to illustrate why it’s called “fictitious”. It looks and acts like a force (or a particle, in the case of the marble), but it isn’t one because it doesn’t actually exist outside that frame of reference. Centripetal force is the “pull” towards the centre of the circle that is required for circular motion; if you think of the actual motion of swinging a bucket around on a string, you’ll be pulling on the string (if you don’t pull, the bucket flies off in a straight line, along with the water in it). And, if you don’t pull the string, and the bucket and water fly off in a straight line, then the water (and bucket) no longer experience the centrifugal force they got while tracing the circular path.
deleted by creator
It’s called a fictitious force because there’s not actually a universal phenomenon like gravity or electromagnetism that causes it. When the bucket starts moving, the water is at rest, and the bucket’s motion causes the water to move in a single direction. When the bucket’s vector starts to change, the water’s vector does not. The water is still moving in the original direction, but that direction is now “outwards” from the centre, and the bucket exhibits new motion on the water, changing the direction it’s traveling again. The water is trying to escape the bucket, but keep going in the direction it’s already going (outwards), not towards the centre of the circle the bucket is tracing. The bucket however is in the way, redirecting it along the circular path. Remove the bucket, and the water goes flying off away from the center of the circle.
Another way to understand a fictitious force is to think of a bunch of marbles in a box, packed tight so all the marbles are touching and none of them can move. Each marble is a particle, push on one and you affect others around it. Now, remove a marble so you have a space, and only one marble can move at a time. And now, reverse your vision - the space left by removing the marble is the particle, an “anti-particle”, and the marbles are free space. Push on the marbles, and the anti-particle moves around like a marble would. It’s not a marble of course, it’s a space, so you could call this “anti-particle” you just created “fictitious”.
So it’s not that the water in the bucket is accelerating inwards, because it’s not the water maintaining that circular motion at all - it’s the bucket maintaining the circular motion. The water’s “inwards acceleration” that keeps it moving in a circle is actually just the water’s inertia, relative to the motion of the bucket.
deleted by creator
For real. Removing SMS support was the biggest mistake they could have made IMO. Even though they’re right that SMS is stupidly insecure, that feature was crucial to getting people to adopt the app. As soon as they removed it, basically everyone I had convinced to install it dropped off. I still haven’t found a trustworthy replacement myself (open to suggestions), so I’m just using Signal alongside the stock Graphene messages app for SMS.
nothing about it at all
Third largest set of protests in American history
🤔
(Note I said nothing about efficacy, but some people do seem to think it’s effective; I guess we’ll see)
I’ve done it. Circumstances sometimes demand, what are you gonna do? 🤷 But also, I always clean up after myself - wipe down around the sink if I splashed, and rinse the toothpaste out of the sink itself. That’s just courtesy, professional and general.
Emotional dysregulation is a bitch.
This is how society corrects behavior
Followed by
Your office comparisons are insignificant here
Really? School is where we learn how to treat other people, and we learn it by example as much as being told (more than, I’d contend).
Claiming this will immediately lead to bullying or just the threat that it might do is to an extent quixotic to me
First off, quote where I claimed it would immediately lead to bullying (good luck). Secondly, yes, whether believe it or not a teacher engaging in this behaviour signals to the other children that it’s okay, there’s an extremely elevated chance that they will take that and run with it.
If a teacher telling a kid to get their feet off the table, to stop shooting spit wads at the row in front of them, to stop rocking back their chair because they might tip over and fall - if all these situations are okay for a teacher to say out loud in front of the class: “Kevin, stop it!” - and I think they are - then telling the kid not to chew on communally shared erasers is no different.
Telling, yes. They’ve already told them to stop it. Your suggestion, however, was
I would go for gentle peer pressure. Point it out in class, do a friendly dressing down how none of the other students want to use the chewed on eraser. If he won’t stop if you say so, maybe you can get other kids to do the trick. The unwanted public attention from his peers might be enough.
“peer pressure”, “dressing-down”, “maybe you can get other kids to do the trick”. That last one in particular. How exactly do you think the other kids would do the trick? Harass the child into stopping, yeah? Or are you gonna come out now claiming that kids are masters of nuance and they’ll be able to get him to stop without resorting to bullying? Your initial suggestion was bad, but at this point you are being absolutely ridiculous. OP “weighed in against the suggestion” with the words
Kids at that age are ruthless, I absolutely can’t do that
And yet you still want to act like I’m in the wrong for saying that it would open the child up to bullying. An absolutely mind-blowingly dumb argument. I sure hope you’re not responsible for children with this kind of thinking; I had a few teachers like you and I hated them for it.
I’d be curious for a follow-up post if you find a way to help him with this! I was this kid when I was little, and needed help and kindness, but there was no understanding for autistic behaviours back then so what I got instead was bullied. I appreciate that you went looking for help instead of just throwing up your hands 🤗
I read your checklist, and I think you missed the bit where I said “when it sounds like all other options have been exhausted”. There’s absolutely no need for the “peer pressure” component, it’s unnecessary to call out a kid on front of a class like that when you could just as easily have a private conversation with the kid about it, and I suggest you think about what it means to enable bullying without actively participating in it.
I don’t think they will go full Lord of the Flies on him
You have no way of accurately predicting this, because it’s children we’re talking about, and they are famously agents of chaos.
I can’t think of a single office I’ve worked where it would be considered professional to call someone out for minorly problematic behaviour in front of all their colleagues, and I don’t see any reason it would be considered acceptable with children either.
I can’t give any of these my personal +1 as I haven’t used them, but I’ve seen their names around for years. Good luck!
And then everyone clapped at the noises he was making, all the way to the next stop, and then President Obama got on the train at the next stop and gave him the Medal of Freedom for his bravery and letting the woman sit down.
Seriously did this motherfucker just move to the city, that he thinks anyone will believe that bullshit?