Interesting to read that the article completely fails to explain why the sales drop in other parts of the world (than the US) and how that might be linked to his nazi salute or anything related to his political views.
If that is peak journalism, then its not surprising that analysts from the states get things wrong these days.
So, what do we learn of this? I mean, if we hadnt done so before?
Nothing Trump says is worth anything.
He will contradict himself many times and deny it was different in the past. His voters dont understand, care, remember or all three.
Its lies, bullshit, bullying, more lies.
How do you ever justify that a president behaves like this??
thank you for the explanation!!
What is a cross-gender?
This is not my native language, can someone put it in a eli5?
Thanx!
Well, just to give a different, albeit also wrong, perspective (from a middle-european society):
Anyone that emigrated to the US after 1850 is not a native…so 70% of y’all are immigrants.
For me it is always a bit hilarious to read how immigrants are bitching about not letting too many immigrants in “their” country.
And as i said… I know my point is wrong to start with, but i am honest and aware about my biased view. Something more people should or could be.
“NoW tRy DoInG a TuRkEy In 10 MiNuTeS!”
Lots of stuff can be cooked in short times and the mere existence of food that is more complicated is no argument against this. Try again. :p
Yepp.
And making a simple cheese sauce takes you the time that the pasta cooks.
Heat broth or milk or both slowly in a pot. Shredd cheese (i like a mix of bluecheese and swiss) and add. Stirr until solved. Add salt, pepper, nutmeg, a dash of white wine. Either use potatoe-starch to thicken or use enough cheese to have it be thick by itself.
Takes you 10 mins tops.
Well, i get that.
And too, many “sauces” you could cook for your pasta are easy, cheaper and wont cost you a second more time thn the pasta needs to cook.
Your statementade me google the statistics and reports for my country (Germany) and i found a credible source that says that up to 40% of victims of relationship-violence are men and that the numbers might be even higher as men dont talk aboit this, its a “taboo” cause men need to be tough and all.
Just sharing my source, maybe you have one too? Would be interested to read more into this.
https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/186686/Haeusliche-Gewalt-gegen-Maenner-Unbeachtet-und-tabuisiert
Nae, you do.
Men are less likely to say they are the victim, specially if the aggressor is the wife. Men are supposed to “man up” if they have problems. Statistics show that women can and are agressors.
And, most important, just because there might be less men who are victims doesnt mean they should not get the very same help if they need it. Coming around with a shitty “oh, its science!” argument is lame and perpetuates the stupid role model where men are not and cannot be the victim and if that it is not bad because its only a few.
Any victim, no matter the gender, deserves help, no matter how many there are, period.
Then maybe open it and read a bit?
“See, if I am right about something, i was right about it from the start, even if I never said anything about it, ever.
If i am wrong about something, i was clearly making a joke, was sarcastic or, on purpose, exaggerated the issue.
It’s your fault, if you don’t understand or recognize what i do.”