Staying home when you know a rapist has a chance is still making a choice.

Well that’s the article my boss used to “prove” to me that trump wasn’t associated with it. It’d be nice if honest reporting wasn’t immediately cast out as being leftist.

Florida follows the guidelines of the state they’re convicted in

Yes that’s my point, a very large asterisk imo

no room for ambiguity or an “asterisk” in his legitimacy,

Except for that tidbit about people who attempt to overthrow democracy aren’t eligible to have their seat at the table, sure.

Definitely has a jerk face but he won me over

Michael Rosenbaum could be absolutely terrifying when he wanted. Great Lex imo

If I had a single private phone call with Putin I’d have lost my security clearance before I hung up the phone.

She said on X that it did not “reflect the GOP values”, referring to the Republican Party, and noted thousands of Puerto Ricans served in the military.

They’re not garbage because they served?

So basically just like linux. Except linux has no marketing

Except for the most popular OS on the Internet, of course.

The one lying that it is all fair, or the crybaby who says its not.

Yep, that’s the only difference between the two candidates. You nailed it!

(This is sarcasm. You’re an idiot.)

Sounds like your insurance company has a data leak problem

I’ma listen to respected sources, not some rando on Lemmy.

The apple podcast website has video podcasts.

Also https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/steve-jobs-at-the-d-all-things-digital-conference-video/id529997900

Are you aware Wikipedia has sources? And that those sources disagree with you?

But it’s not called droidcast. And Wikipedia says video podcasts exist so I’m not sure what you’re trying to get at.

So since I’ve never owned an iPod I’ve never truly listened to a podcast? Or does the person creating it have to own the iPod?

The article didn’t make a claim. It’s reporting on claims made by other people. There’s more to an article than the title but even the title isn’t explicitly stating what he did is illegal. It’s literally reporting on people accusing him of it yet you latched on to the accusation like they’re reporting it as fact, also known as strawman.

Purposely obtuse, got it. Go strawman somewhere else