Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • arankays@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I tried Waymo when I was visiting LA a few months ago. Genuinely terrific stuff.

    I do not trust Teslas one bit though.

    • Ken Oh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Tesla doesn’t use lidar for its sensing, living on the prayer that AI will just get good enough soon enough. Absolutely galaxy brained decision.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      waymo’s have almost hit me like three times, and if i were slower, they would have. you are part of the problem. those are killing machines.

      • grumps@lemmy.i.secretponi.es
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m surrounded by waymos every time I go out and I can tell you that if they “almost hit you” three times then that’s very likely a you problem – and a reason for more waymos, not fewer.

        Anecdotally, only once have I been in a situation where I’ve said, “do better, robot” because I was slightly inconvenienced by it.

        By the numbers there are very few waymo incidents compared to human drivers and those include waymos being hit by bicyclists who aren’t paying attention.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          “if something almost does grievous bodily harm to you, we need more of it, keep playing those odds!”? that seems like a request for me to be harmed.

          • grumps@lemmy.i.secretponi.es
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Again, based on experience, and the data, if you were exposed to “grievous bodily harm” then it seems like you should change something.

            I don’t know you so I’m not going to suggest you’re making up how you feel about the situation but you definitely don’t sound like you’re expressing an accurate representation of reality.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              have you ever been hit by a car? maybe try it sometime before you talk about this shit, because you’re being really casual, and I cannot stress how unpleasant an experience it is.

        • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Uhh, think you could rephrase this so it doesn’t sound like you’re rooting for the Waymo in any Waymo-bicycle accident?

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          almost because I dodged.

          If these vehicles don’t need to obey the procedural laws that are supposed to keep me safe, why should I refrain from smashing them with a hammer, or taking them apart and selling the pieces, or making cool sculptures out of them?

          aside from being profoundly lazy, of course.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              these companies do not provide data. they provide blatantly doctored ad copy.

              and the engineers that design them have said there’s no way to make them follow traffic rules perfectly. that they do often sacrifice safety for efficiency when the choice can be made.

              • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                What are you even on about tin foil. Waymos are on the road - how is this data doctored? You can literally see that it’s safer than human driving in this exact environment.