• overcast5348@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fair enough, and I do agree that everyone should have free (or reasonably cheap) access to healthcare, education and shelter. (I’m “commie” as fuck, depending on whom you ask)

    That said, if all the existing benefits aren’t enough to attract good people into the army, I see why the government would want to keep increasing benefits till they get their fill of soldiers – all in the name of national security.

    Also, these things tend to have knock on effects, no? If private sector starts losing out on his employees because they’d rather work for the government as long as it’s a remote job, then the private sector is welcome to change rules to attract employees too! It’s a “free market” of labour after all.

    • hibsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really like your last point, and I hope that’s the effect of this. I just also hope that it’s not to the detriment of the competitive service.

      We’re already seeing a decrease in quality hires due to direct-hire authority — without checks on the hiring authority, they have a tendency to just hire fast without actually determining if someone is qualified for a role.