Kelly Roskam of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions discusses a Supreme Court case that will decide if a federal law prohibiting possession of firearms by people subject to domestic violence protection orders is constitutional

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The easy solution would be to let only let people who have proven beyond doubt that they are good enough to own and carry a gun are allowed to do that. If the faith into their ability gets dented, put those weapons in custody until the case is cleared. That’s how about any other country does handle the gun issue, and they all have less problems than the US for some unexplainable reason…

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alternatively- if someone is to dangerous to have a gun then they are too dangerous to participate in society any more.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are quite a lot of people who I would let participate in society, but never with a gun.