• sulgoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      This sounds like something that would be in the back end so likely not. But if spoofing user agents fixes the problem then I’d say it’s evidence enough to warrant a deeper look.

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      it’s pretty inconclusive if there’s no context for how that code is called. I’m kinda confused why the article wouldn’t have provided any additional detail other than a single line of code. why bother digging at all?

      • _thisdot@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        it’s part of their anti-adblock code. without going into too much details, they can instantly find out whether ad-block is trying to do anything on chrome, but on firefox they need a 5 sec delay

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Which is honestly to Firefox’s credit. Making it harder to find out stuff about your browser is a good thing, unless it has to do with feature support.

          But the fact that they don’t give a shit and are willing to ruin the user experience for it, that’s despicable.

        • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d be more likely to believe that if spoofing your user agent didn’t immediately fix the issue.

    • fernandofig@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Have you read past that screenshot of the code, though? It says the problem was not limited to Firefox, it seems Edge users reported problems as well. Anecdotally, I did experience that delay problem on Thorium this weekend as well. I have seen a variation of this problem almost a month ago, where sometimes the video would take a long time (like, over a minute, sometimes) to load, or often just not load at all. So I just chalked it up to Youtube having done something stupid on their end.

    • lipilee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      that half sentence in the aa article though

      “That move makes sense in many ways, as the platform needs to make money to survive…”

      should we also start a gofundme for youtube, i am suddenly worried for them /s

      • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        not saying we should worry for them, but youtube is run at a loss so they do actually need money from SOMEWHERE to maintain youtube. youtube still sucks and this is definitely not the way to win over users but thems the facts

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Alphabet made $50 billion in profit last year. They’ve got enough to run YouTube, but enough isn’t enough.