• SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s literally not noticable if you’re looking at it from a reasonable distance. I’m not talking about a cluster.

        • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s funny how everyone pretends to give a fuck about environmentalism until they’re faced with the most minor of minor inconveniences.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I like how you’re trying to tie manufacturers selling defective items at full price to environmentalism as if that makes the practice okay.

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The conversation is actually about manufacturer greed (w.r.t sale prices going past $1000) and audacity to ask customers to pay that much for a less than perfect (their marketing material, theur words) device.

            • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I hate greedy corporations as much as the next guy, but manufacturers are not going to up their QC to include single dead pixels and take a hit to their profit margin. They’d increase prices, by a lot.

              Maybe there’s a market for displays that meet this standard for the nitpickers, and sell the ones that fail at a discount, but they’d definitely be a premium.