“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • boywar3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Centrist Democrats right now don’t need to accept tradeoffs because they are needed atm. As demographics shift, eventually, things will change as they must.

    As for accepting genocide…well, if I had to choose between my own safety and someone else’s, I know where I’d stand…

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Just accept genocide because the group that runs the party may one day in the nebulous future have to accept tradeoffs”

      is not the same as “Everybody has to accept tradeoffs.”

      As for accepting genocide…well, if I had to choose between my own safety and someone else’s, I know where I’d stand…

      You’ve made your position regarding instant unquestioning support of genocide for its own sake abundantly clear.

      • boywar3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I love the big sweeping generalizations you make; it really shows an utter lack of understanding reality. Keep up the purity tests so the left can’t ever get anywhere because we are too busy infighting I guess

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Keep up the purity tests so the left can’t ever get anywhere because we are too busy infighting I guess

          Keep expecting everyone to be happy with tradeoffs you make on their behalf but never your own.