• hackerwacker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    But eg. RawTherapee has film simulations built-in, and you can save profiles and then apply them in bulk. It’s only a bit more work than jpegs but a lot more flexibility.

    • jace525@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I get it. I shoot in RAW+JPEG and sometimes the filter I prethought up isn’t working and I’ll batch edit the RAWs. But I’ve learned enough and enjoy shooting in the moment. I am happy with my JPEGs 90% of the time. Some examples: www.niedermier.org

    • CoreOffset@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think a big part of why people seem to really like the film simulations in the Fuji cameras is because you can create or copy other people settings, “recipes”, and you get a nice live preview right on the LCD screen as you are shooting. It gives you a much closer visualization of your desired final product right on the back of the camera as you are shooting.

      RawTherapee has film simulations built-in

      Have you used them? If so, how do you like them?

      I have no experience with RawTherapee but I’m someone that doesn’t like spending a ton of time editing photos.

      • hackerwacker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, I’ve used them a lot. You have to download them separately, but it’s just a zip file that you extract and then tell rawtherapee where it is. It has many films; I really liked Portra 400 for portraits.

        I think you can also get the Fuji film LUTs, so if you shoot raw you can later pick whichever film simulation you like.

        For live preview I usually set minimum contrast and saturation, to get wider dynamic range (on the preview)