• 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I spent 20 years in a red region of NY. It’s absolutely miserable. Yeah you have a liberal lean at the state level, but at the local level everything is a constant fight for basic rights. There’s also almost no job prospects, no social mobility, no community, and no diversity. Not to mention if you’re a minority you’re constantly at odds with the police, even if you didn’t do anything criminal.

    The area I lived in cost almost as much as NYC to live in but with half the income and literally nothing to do.

    It’s not worth it.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe not for you, but if you can WFH and don’t ever leave your compound it’s a lot prettier.

      Plus there’s always some chorin’ if you’re bored.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is true and I’ve seen it work really well for people that want to be on the periphery of a major city - but in the exurbs if they WFH. Close enough for a trip to the city to do something worthwhile, but not doing the daily grind of driving into the city to work every weekday…as long as the state is blue and the exurbs are not tinged deep red, it can be very nice.

        • ferralcat@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think I’m the opposite here. Live in the city. Commute is short. Things I need are nearby and walkable. If I want to go hiking or something it’s a 20 minute drive. Living in the suburbs means basic needs involve car rides and parking.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          Close enough for a trip to the city to do something worthwhile

          Yes, yes. Continue spreading the rumor that there’s nothing worthwhile in rural places. That way there’s fewer people there.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh, I’m not saying that there is nothing worthwhile to do in rural places. I meant something that is worthwhile enough to make the trek into a city.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wow! I live in a red, economically depressed rural area of a blue state. It was booming when there were some Democrats in local offices but the locals fell for the right wing propaganda. Most smart kids moved away when they graduated. Now there are lots of drugs and drunks with big trucks. I learned to fly, SCUBA dive, garden, graft trees, hunt, hike, forage and build things. “Nothing to do” is a state of mind no matter where you are.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rural NY is much more rural (with everything that entails, including sundown towns) than people expect. Nearby, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut all have very rural (and cheap and economically depressed) areas with fewer crazy neighbors. Still not much to do unless you get into outdoor hobbies, but doable