• Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Considering their recent signal in the form of denying Smith’s request for expedited review, I’m… honestly not optimistic.

    Wasn’t this 9-0 unanimous?

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      We don’t know, all we know iirc is that at least four justices said “nah bro go through the regular appeals process.” So reading the tea leaves, at least Thomas and Alito, plus any two of Gorsuch, Roberts, ACB, and Kavanaugh said no, at minimum.

      It’s hard to say with certainty what this signals about how they’ll rule on the various Trump cases, but at minimum it indicates that they either don’t realize that he’s trying to delay the trials in the hopes he can win the election and have them all dropped, or they don’t care that’s what he’s doing. If they really_don’t_ care, it could be because they approve of his actions–and will likely rule in his favor–or simply because they value strict adherence to the regular process even at the potential risk of allowing an unqualified candidate (in the actual constitutional sense) obtaining office and doing whatever damage he can. None of those reasons bode very well for this particular case, IMO.