A transgender woman running for an Ohio House seat has been disqualified for failing to disclose her former name on petitions circulated to voters, in violation of a seldom-enforced state law.

Local election officials informed Vanessa Joy, who hoped to run as a Democrat for Ohio House District 50, that she was not eligible to do so, despite having collected the signatures necessary to run.

Joy sought to run in a firmly Republican district covering Stark County, just south of Akron.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I totally get not wanting to disclose your deadname where a ton of conservative assholes will get ahold of it, but you probably should still have to report any other names you’ve gone by to get into public office.

      • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Anyone should have to to get into public office imo, not just her.

        She’s definitely not who I’d start enforcing that rule on tbf, but everyone should have to I think.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is the important question. I have no sympathy for the candidate not wanting to disclose the previous name - just because some people might react negatively doesn’t mean they get to hide their past

        …… assuming it’s equally applied. If it’s true that other are not held to the same standard, that the requirement wasn’t communicated or known, or there is no chance to fix it before the election, that’s BS

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Again, who’s hiding? Legal name changes are public records. No one is hiding. You have a solution in search of a problem.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I would never seek to justify every law. I’m sure many are bogus.

            However if it only applies to one person, or is some ancient thing long forgotten brought back for one person, it is clearly discriminatory and should be invalid, regardless of whether it had any merit to begin with