• Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would not do it if they didn’t think it could save them more money than it costs.

      • SamC@lemmy.nzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but that will be based on some funky valuations of “brand” and “mindshare” that someone has pulled out of their ass.

        • Dave@lemmy.nzM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most likely that is involved. But I’d guess there are some significant savings to be made if they can streamline their storebrand products to use the one brand, reuse the same ads in NZ & Oz, etc.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget their accounting will include some amount of goodwill of their various brands.

        There are data-driven marketers but they are few and far between.