• MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lessons for whom? I have several things I would like to kill but lack the requisite trillions to execute my vision.

      • z3n0x@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Tired of running your massively popular online service? Call BrandWreckers™ , your one-stop shop for dismantling user loyalty and brand reputation. Call now and lose your first 10k users for free!”

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know I wonder if we could create a non profit that exists only to buy things and then donate them (IP, closed source, whatever) to the public domain. If you had a savvy board, such an organization could do a lot of good.

        Something like this must already exist, right?

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean they would need to be paid, but idk about a percentage. Mostly just to fairly compensate them for the time spent vetting deals.

            • jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What’s savvy about getting paid just for your time? You need to get paid for expertise, opportunities, networking… that’s at least 10%, since a non-profit wouldn’t have preference shares.

              • MagicShel@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m leery about a percentage just because I perceive a conflict of interest. Overall compensation of 10% might be about right, but tying actual compensation to the cost of stuff that is bought creates a perverse incentive to overspend on things. That’s money donated for the betterment of humanity, not so I can have a 3 acre swimming pool.

                But IDK maybe I’m looking at it wrong.

                • jarfil@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think you are looking at it kind of wrong, in that: with a savvy board, the first savvy thing they would do, would be to guarantee their own self-benefit, going head first into a conflict of interest… meaning you can’t have a project like that driven by a savvy board, instead you need an altruistic, idealistic, etc. board… but then, a non-savvy board, would be much likely to just squander the money, or get swindled out of it, so… I don’t think a project like that would ever work as expected.