Which one(s) and why?

  • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    EndeavourOS. I like the simplicity and minimalism of stock Arch, bloated distros bother me. I have been thinking of trying out Linux Mint again though, I used it for years and it was really good.

    • rodbiren@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is precisely where I am at. Endeavor for when I need a newer kernel and Mint for when I want something that just dang works without too much config and driver work. I suggest Mint to friends but love having AUR and yay.

      • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The just dang works part of Mint is so nice. I do like learning and tinkering, but I have to say setting up my printer in endeavourOS was brutal! I had all the right software installed, but it ended up needing a single line of code pasted in to a file I never would have guessed on my own. I’ll paste the info here on the slight chance it will save anyone else from the trauma I went through 😅

        Reference article: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Avahi

        2.1 Hostname resolution
        Avahi provides local hostname resolution using a “hostname.local” naming scheme. To enable it, install the nss-mdns package and start/enable avahi-daemon.service. use sudo instead of doas if that’s the tool you prefer.

        doas systemctl start avahi-daemon.service

        Then, edit the file /etc/nsswitch.conf and change the hosts line to include mdns_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] before resolve and dns. It should look like:

        hosts: mymachines mdns_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve [!UNAVAIL=return] files myhostname dns
        
    • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      EndeavourOS is way too opinionated on i3 for my liking, and the theme is not great. Still it is very stable and offers a reasonable out of the box arch experience.

      • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do they customize it too heavily away from its defaults? I use KDE so I don’t bump in to that issue myself.

        • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not sure about KDE. On i3 they have it customized a lot and there’s some things I don’t like: when opening a terminal it will always open in a workspace assigned, by them, for terminals. The same with file manager windows, browsers, et al. I find it to be extremely irritating

          • paradox2011@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh yeah, I get what you mean. There were a few tweaks like that in the KDE file manager too. Dolphin would open with a lot of extra features running like a terminal at the bottom of the window and extra information panes on the sides. They were all normal dolphin features that were just toggled on by default, so I was able to get back to a cleaner experience with a few clicks, but it sounds like that may be their MO: turn on ‘helpful’ features in the user space by default. That was the only app that had non - default settings in KDE that I found, it sounds like it’s not as customized as i3.